Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34540465›Full record

ReviewCureus2021

Virtual Reality as an Affirmative Spin-Off to Laparoscopic Training: An Updated Review.

Ketan Kantamaneni, Krishi Jalla, Mahvish Renzu, Rahul Jena, Amudhan Kannan, Ruchi Jain, Suchitra Muralidharan, Vijaya Lakshmi Yanamala, Zainab Zubair, Jerry Lorren Dominic and 4 more

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 4 institutions in 5 countries.

Ketan KantamaneniGeneral Surgery, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences & Psychology, Fairfield, USA.
Krishi JallaInternal Medicine, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences & Psychology, Fairfield, USA.
Mahvish RenzuInternal medicine, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences & Psychology, Fairfield, USA.
Rahul JenaInternal Medicine, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences & Psychology, Fairfield, USA.
Amudhan KannanGeneral Surgery, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences & Psychology, Fairfield, USA.
Ruchi JainDiagnostic Radiology, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences & Psychology, Fairfield, USA.
Suchitra MuralidharanInternal Medicine, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences & Psychology, Fairfield, USA.
Vijaya Lakshmi YanamalaGeneral Surgery, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences & Psychology, Fairfield, USA.
Zainab ZubairDermatology, California Institute of Behavioural Neurosciences & Psychology, Fairfield, USA.
Jerry Lorren DominicGeneral Surgery, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences & Psychology, Fairfield, USA.
Myat WinGeneral Surgery, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences & Psychology, Fairfield, USA.
Anjli TaraGeneral Surgery, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences & Psychology, Fairfield, USA.
Sheila W RuoGeneral Surgery, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences & Psychology, Fairfield, USA.
Michael AlfonsoSchool of Medicine, Universidad del Rosario, Bogota, COL.
California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences and Psychology (United States) · USNottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust · GBSiddhartha Medical College · INUniversidad del Rosario · CO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Latest advancements in science lead to drastic improvements in patient health care. Techniques and technology evolved in surgery over the years have resulted in the improvement of patient outcomes by leaps and bounds. Open surgeries previously done for procedures like appendectomy and cholecystectomy evolved into laparoscopic minimally invasive procedures. Such procedures pose few challenges to the surgeons, like lack of tissue feedback and fulcrum effect of the abdominal wall. But training surgeons for such an advanced skill is still following conventional methods. These procedures can be effectively trained using Virtual Reality (VR), which can simulate operations outside the operating room (OR). To maximize the outcomes of VR training, knowledge on various strategies affecting the skills acquisition and retention in VR training is essential. This review collected information from PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library (CENTRAL) databases. Data from the previous ten years are included in the review. This included documents, clinical trials, meta-analysis, randomized controlled trials, reviews, systematic reviews, letters to editors, and grey literature. After an advanced Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) search, we got 59,532 results, and after the application of filters, 189 results showed up. Out of these, studies that were not exclusively relevant to the use of VR in laparoscopic surgery were manually excluded, and a total of 35 articles were included in the study. VR is found to be an excellent training modality with promising outcomes. It helps the surgeons perform the surgery accurately at a faster pace and improves confidence and multitasking ability in OR. Instructor feedback from mentors and deliberate practice of trainees, and early introduction of haptics in VR resulted in the most effective outcomes of the VR training. Box trainers are also compared with VR trainers as they are the cheaper modalities of training. However, this area needs more research to conclude if box trainers can act as a cheaper alternative to VR training providing similar outcomes.

Indexed as

box trainerhapticslaparoscopyoutcomessimulatorsurgeonsurgerytechnologyvirtual reality

Identifiers

PMID34540465
PMCPMC8447854
OpenAlexW3193859738

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.