ReviewCureus2021
Effectiveness of Stem Cell Therapies in Improving Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Heart Failure.
Review in Cureus, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Therapeutic Effects of Mesenchymal Stromal Cells Require Mitochondrial Transfer and Quality Control.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Cell-based medicinal products approved in the European Union: current evidence and perspectives.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Heart failure (HF), continuing to be a notable cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide, also is a noteworthy economic burden to the patients. Current medical management of HF has poor efficacy to completely arrest or reverse the progression to end-stage disease. As the option of cardiac transplantation remains limited to few patients, the stem cell approach continues to be a promising one in developing a novel therapy in the treatment of HF. This review attempts to discuss and compare the outcomes of numerous clinical trials that involved treatment of HF of variable etiologies with stem cells of numerous lineages such as bone marrow-derived cells (BMCs), mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), cardiosphere derived progenitor cells (CDCs), etc. We reviewed articles and randomized controlled trials (RCT) that used stem cells to treat heart failure. The articles and RCT studies were obtained through a search on PubMed and Medline databases and performed using regular and medical subject heading (MeSH) keyword search strategy. A total of 17 trial-based studies, along with other articles that met the aim of the review, were selected. A discussion of the findings from major clinical trials such as the C-CURE, CHART-1, POSEIDON, POSEIDON-DCM, TAC-HFT, and other small scale trials highlights the change in functional and mechanical parameters of HF, namely, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), end-diastolic volume (EDV), end-systolic volume (ESV), 6-minute walking test distance (6MWTD), N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) levels and assessment of New York heart association (NYHA) class of heart failure, and Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHFQ) score to reflect improvement in quality of life (QoL) of patients. Out of the studies analyzed, the majority reported significant improvements in at least two of the parameters mentioned above. However, more phase three randomized trials are required to compare the efficacy of multiple lineages of stem cells, factoring in molecular and dosage factors to develop a standardized therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.