Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34540447›Full record

ArticleCureus2021

High Frequency 10 kHz Spinal Cord Stimulation as a First Line Programming Option for Patients With Chronic Pain: A Retrospective Study and Review of the Current Evidence.

Mickey E Abraham, Justin Gold, Akhil Dondapati, Kristin Sheaffer, Julian L Gendreau, Antonios Mammis

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. General Innovations in Pain Management.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Spinal Cord Stimulation for Painful Diabetic Neuropathy.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Mickey E AbrahamNeurological Surgery, University of California, La Jolla, USA.
Justin GoldDepartment of Neurosurgery, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, USA.
Akhil DondapatiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Rutger New Jersey Medical School, Newark, USA.
Kristin SheafferOrthopedic Surgery, Mercer University School of Medicine, Savannah, USA.
Julian L GendreauDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins Whiting School of Engineering, Baltimore, USA.
Antonios MammisDepartment of Neurosurgery, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, USA.
Rutgers New Jersey Medical SchoolJohns Hopkins University · USMercer University · USNeurological Surgery · USRutgers, The State University of New Jersey · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction Neuromodulation is an evolving and increasingly popular therapy for chronic pain management. Recent data suggest that novel waveforms have demonstrated greater benefit over traditional spinal cord stimulation (SCS). The authors conducted a retrospective review of patients undergoing high-frequency 10 kHz SCS at a single tertiary medical center for the purpose of contributing further evidence to this growing body of data. The literature of high-frequency SCS published to date was also reviewed. Methods A retrospective chart review was performed for patients with chronic pain syndrome, including failed back surgery syndrome and sciatica alone, who underwent high-frequency SCS at 10 kHz. This data was analyzed using R software (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria) for statistical analysis. The PubMed database was searched for relevant articles using the search terms "high frequency," "10 kHz," and "spinal cord stimulation." All relevant studies conducted to date were included in this literature review. Results Twenty-one patients had complete follow-up data and were included in this study. Of the 21 patients, 85.7% subjectively reported post-operative pain relief while 71.4% of the total patients reported pain relief by ≥ 50%. There was a statistically significant decrease in mean VAS scores from pre-operative to 12-months post-operative (8.52 vs 4.37, p < 0.001). Additionally, 76.5% of patients subjectively reported improvements in sleep and activities of daily living. Recent studies indicate that high-frequency SCS appears to be a viable option for delivering quality pain relief in patients for chronic regional pain syndrome, failed back surgery syndrome, sciatica, and also pain in the upper cervical region of the spine. Conclusion This article provides evidence both with the authors' own institutional data and from the currently published literature for the efficacy of using high-frequency SCS at 10 kHz as a first-line programming option for patients undergoing SCS.

Indexed as

10 khzback painchronic painhigh frequencyspinal cordstimulation

Identifiers

PMID34540447
PMCPMC8442632
OpenAlexW3193305359

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.