ReviewCurrent dermatology reports2021
Social Media and Ethical Challenges for the Dermatologist.
Review in Current dermatology reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.
- Online Discussions About Alopecia Areata in 5 Arabian Gulf Countries: Social Media Listening Study.JMIR dermatology · 2026Article
- Scope and Prospects of Social Media for Patient Education and Engagement in Medical Practice.Cureus · 2026Review
- [Ophthalmology online : Representation of the discipline ophthalmology on instagram].Die Ophthalmologie · 2025Article
- Topical steroid withdrawal: self-diagnosis, unconscious bias and social media.Skin health and disease · 2025Article
- Dermatologists' Way of Informative Content About Dermatology and Cosmetology on Social Media.Journal of cosmetic dermatology · 2025Article
- Information Regarding Dermatology as Seen on the Social Media Platform TikTok.JMIR dermatology · 2025Article
- Development of a Medical Social Media Ethics Scale and Assessment of #IRad, #CardioTwitter, and #MedTwitter Posts: Mixed Methods Study.JMIR infodemiology · 2024Article
- Use of Social Media for Patient Education in Dermatology: Narrative Review.JMIR dermatology · 2023Review
- Social Media Use Among Members of the Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society: Results of a Web-Based Survey.Journal of medical Internet research · 2023Article
- What do Patients Want to See on Social Media? Evidence From a Two-Year Experiment.Dermatology practical & conceptual · 2023Article
- Article
- Social Media and Urticaria - A Data Audit of FacebookIndian journal of dermatologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose of Review: The purpose of review is to provide guidance on the use of social media within the context of dermatology and discuss its ethical, professional, and legal implications in education, mentorship, networking, business, and clinical settings. Recent Findings: Despite its fundamental value as a means of communication and knowledge sharing, social media carries legal, ethical, and professional challenges. Healthcare providers have run into issues such as misinformation, conflicts of interest, and overstepping patient-physician boundaries when using social media. An interesting finding is that dermatologists commonly engage with an online audience through social media marketing or being an influencer to improve business and extend their reach to clients; however, this warrants formal training and the need to monitor their own online presence to prevent legal consequences. Summary: Social media has become integral in everyday life; billions of people now receive information and stay connected with each other through social platforms. Within medicine, social media has enhanced various aspects of healthcare, such as professional networking, patient care, and patient education. In dermatology, social media allows dermatologists to promote their businesses and services through patient testimonials, posting advice on blogs, and networking with a large audience of potential patients. However, having a social media presence must be exercised with care, purpose, and transparency to maximize benefits and minimize harmful consequences. This is especially important when inappropriate social media posts by physicians can be scrutinized for breaching patient confidentiality, violating privacy, financial conflicts of interest, and possibly disseminating incorrect information.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.