Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34540344›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of blood research2021

Safety and efficacy of splenectomy in immune thrombocytopenia.

Kundan Mishra, Suman Kumar, Rajeev Sandal, Aditya Jandial, Kamal Kant Sahu, Kanwaljeet Singh, Ankur Ahuja, Venkatesan Somasundaram, Rajiv Kumar, Rajan Kapoor and 7 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of blood research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kundan MishraDepartment of Clinical Hematology and Stem Cell Transplant, Army Hospital (Research & Referral) Delhi, India.
Suman KumarDepartment of Clinical Hematology and Stem Cell Transplant, Army Hospital (Research & Referral) Delhi, India.
Rajeev SandalDepartment of Radiotherapy and Oncology, IGMC Shimla Himachal Pradesh, India.
Aditya JandialDepartment of Internal Medicine, PGIMER Chandigarh, India.
Kamal Kant SahuDepartment of Internal Medicine, Saint Vincent Hospital Worcester, Massachusetts, USA.
Kanwaljeet SinghDept of Lab Sciences and Molecular Medicine, Army Hospital (Research & Referral) Delhi, India.
Ankur AhujaDept of Lab Sciences and Molecular Medicine, Army Hospital (Research & Referral) Delhi, India.
Venkatesan SomasundaramDept of Lab Sciences and Molecular Medicine, Army Hospital (Research & Referral) Delhi, India.
Rajiv KumarDepartment of Clinical Hematology and Stem Cell Transplant, Army Hospital (Research & Referral) Delhi, India.
Rajan KapoorDepartment of Clinical Hematology and Stem Cell Transplant, Army Hospital (Research & Referral) Delhi, India.
Sanjeevan SharmaDepartment of Clinical Hematology and Stem Cell Transplant, Army Hospital (Research & Referral) Delhi, India.
Jasjit SinghDepartment of Clinical Hematology and Stem Cell Transplant, Army Hospital (Research & Referral) Delhi, India.
Uday YanamandraDepartment of Clinical Hematology and Stem Cell Transplant, Army Hospital (Research & Referral) Delhi, India.
Satyaranjan DasDepartment of Clinical Hematology and Stem Cell Transplant, Army Hospital (Research & Referral) Delhi, India.
Tathagat ChaterjeeDept of Lab Sciences and Molecular Medicine, Army Hospital (Research & Referral) Delhi, India.
Ajay SharmaDepartment of Clinical Hematology and Stem Cell Transplant, Army Hospital (Research & Referral) Delhi, India.
Velu NairDepartment of Clinical Hematology and Stem Cell Transplant, Army Hospital (Research & Referral) Delhi, India.
Army Hospital Research and Referral · INPost Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundImmune Thrombocytopenia (ITP) is characterized by low platelet counts. Splenectomy has been in practice for the treatment of ITP since the early 20th century. We aimed to analyze the data of ITP patients from our hospital who underwent splenectomy and further present the long-term outcome and safety profile in these patients.

methodThis study was a single-center, registry based study conducted at a tertiary care hospital in Northern India. Patients aged 18 years or more, who underwent splenectomy after at least one line of therapy, were included in the study. The primary outcome was the overall response rate (ORR) at one month after splenectomy. Secondary outcomes were sustained response, relapse-free survival, factors affecting the ORR, and adverse events after splenectomy.

resultsForty-five patients of ITP were included in the study. Thirty-six patients underwent splenectomy in the first half (2001-2010), of the study period. The median age of the patients was 38 (19-56) years. The median duration from diagnosis to splenectomy was 1.76 (0.47-2.58) years. The median number of therapy received before splenectomy was 3 (1-6). The overall response rate (ORR) post-splenectomy at day 30 was 89.2% with 61.8% complete response (CR). The ORR was 88.5% at 1-year, with 48.8% CR. The relapse-free survival (RFS) at 5-years was 57.38% (95% Confidence Interval 40.59-71.02%), There was no effect of duration of disease, age, gender, and prior therapy received, on the ORR at one-month. At one year, the platelet response was significantly better in patients who had a CR at one-month than patients who had a partial response at one month. The relapse-free survival was better in patients who achieved CR after 1-month of splenectomy. During the median follow-up of 5.02 (1 month-20 years) years, there were five cases of overwhelming post-splenectomy infection (OPSI). There was no recorded incidence of perioperative mortality, deep vein thrombosis, or mesenteric thrombosis. DISCUSSION: Despite the variation in outcome from different studies, splenectomy gives the best possible long-term treatment-free remission amongst all the available second-line agents. It is also, one of the most financially affordable therapies. Despite advantages, the number of ITP patients undergoing splenectomy has been on the decline and largely attributable to the newer and more effective second-line therapies. There is no pre-surgery variable predicting the ORR after splenectomy.

conclusionSplenectomy in ITP offers a long-term sustained response at an economical cost.

Indexed as

chronic ITPITPresource constraint settingssecond-line therapySplenectomythrombocytopenia

Identifiers

PMID34540344
PMCPMC8446833
OpenAlexW3200327014

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.