Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34540190›Full record

ArticleJournal of healthcare engineering2021

Comparing Machine Learning Methods to Improve Fall Risk Detection in Elderly with Osteoporosis from Balance Data.

German Cuaya-Simbro, Alberto-I Perez-Sanpablo, Eduardo-F Morales, Ivett Quiñones Uriostegui, Lidia Nuñez-Carrera

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of healthcare engineering, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

German Cuaya-SimbroInstituto Tecnológico Superior del Oriente del Estado de Hidalgo (ITESA), Carretera Apan-Tepeapulco Km 3.5, Colonia Las Peñitas, Apan Hidalgo, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0001-6303-154X
Alberto-I Perez-SanpabloInstituto Nacional De Rehabilitación Luis Guillermo Ibarra Ibarra (INR-LGII), Mexico-Xochimilco Av. 289, Arenal de Guadalupe, 14389 México City, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0003-0550-928X
Eduardo-F MoralesInstituto Nacional de Astrofísica Óptica y Electrónica (INAOE), Luis Enrique Erro 1, Santa Maria Tonatzintla, 72840 Puebla, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-7618-8762
Ivett Quiñones UriosteguiInstituto Nacional De Rehabilitación Luis Guillermo Ibarra Ibarra (INR-LGII), Mexico-Xochimilco Av. 289, Arenal de Guadalupe, 14389 México City, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0003-3522-5085
Lidia Nuñez-CarreraInstituto Nacional De Rehabilitación Luis Guillermo Ibarra Ibarra (INR-LGII), Mexico-Xochimilco Av. 289, Arenal de Guadalupe, 14389 México City, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0003-2609-1978

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Falls are a multifactorial cause of injuries for older people. Subjects with osteoporosis are particularly vulnerable to falls. We study the performance of different computational methods to identify people with osteoporosis who experience a fall by analysing balance parameters. Balance parameters, from eyes open and closed posturographic studies, and prospective registration of falls were obtained from a sample of 126 community-dwelling older women with osteoporosis (age 74.3 ± 6.3) using World Health Organization Questionnaire for the study of falls during a follow-up of 2.5 years. We analyzed model performance to determine falls of every developed model and to validate the relevance of the selected parameter sets. The principal findings of this research were (1) models built using oversampling methods with either IBk (KNN) or Random Forest classifier can be considered good options for a predictive clinical test and (2) feature selection for minority class (FSMC) method selected previously unnoticed balance parameters, which implies that intelligent computing methods can extract useful information with attributes which otherwise are disregarded by experts. Finally, the results obtained suggest that Random Forest classifier using the oversampling method to balance the data independent of the set of variables used got the best overall performance in measures of sensitivity (>0.71), specificity (>0.18), positive predictive value (PPV >0.74), and negative predictive value (NPV >0.66) independent of the set of variables used. Although the IBk classifier was built with oversampling data considering information from both eyes opened and closed, using all variables got the best performance (sensitivity >0.81, specificity >0.19, PPV = 0.97, and NPV = 0.66).

Indexed as

Accidental FallsOsteoporosisAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMachine LearningPostural BalanceProspective Studies

Identifiers

PMID34540190
PMCPMC8448611

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.