ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2021
Comparison of etomidate and propofol-mediated anesthesia induction followed by intubation and sevoflurane maintenance during ERCP in obese patients.
Article in American journal of translational research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Anesthetic and Sedative Regimens for Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography: A Network Meta-Analysis.Digestive diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Pooled it
- Article
- Article
- Effects of body mass index on propofol-induced cardiovascular depression in the Pakistani population.Pakistan journal of medical sciencesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveIn this study, we focused on obese patients (Body Mass Index (BMI) ≥30 kg/m
methodsA total of 180 patients were computer-randomized into a propofol group or an etomidate group, with 90 cases in each group. Patients received anesthesia induction by etomidate or propofol followed by intubation and sevoflurane maintenance during ERCP. Baseline characteristics, information about procedure-related time and satisfaction, and adverse events were collected and compared between the etomidate group and propofol group.
resultsBaseline characteristics of both groups were similar. The propofol group had a longer time of intraoperative SpO
conclusionIn obese patients who underwent ERCP and needed intubation, etomidate appears better than propofol for anesthesia induction followed by anesthesia maintenance of sevoflurane.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34540121PMC8430081W3201444457What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.