ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2021
Study on the effect of PICC in parenteral nutrition support for colorectal cancer.
Article in American journal of translational research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Insertion site of central venous catheter among hospitalized adult patients: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2022Pooled it
- Application Value of Nutrition Support Team in Chemotherapy Period of Colon Cancer Based on Internet Multidisciplinary Treatment Mode.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2022Article
- Application value of modified skin expansion in PICC catheterization under the guidance of B-ultrasound in gastrointestinal cancer patients with chemotherapy.American journal of translational research · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo study the effect of peripherally inserted central catheters (PICC) in parenteral nutrition support for patients with colorectal cancer.
methodsA total of 98 patients with colorectal cancer who were admitted to our hospital from January 2019 to June 2020 were selected into this study. The selected patients were randomly divided into two groups. Both groups were given parenteral nutrition support treatment. Patients who received central venous catheter (CVC) nutritional support therapy were included in the CVC group, and those who received PICC nutritional support were included in the PICC group (49 cases in each group). The two groups were compared in terms of the indicators of catheterization, the one-time success rate of catheterization and the occurrence of complications. The changes in nutritional status indicators and serum inflammatory factor levels of the two groups of patients before and after treatment were observed, and the tolerance of the two groups of patients to intubation was investigated.
resultsThe puncture time and catheter indwelling time in the PICC group were longer than those in the CVC group (P < 0.05); the complication rate was 14.29% in the PICC group, and 32.65% in the CVC group (P < 0.05); there were no statistically significant differences in TP, PA, ALB, and TF between the two groups before and after treatment (P > 0.05); after treatment, the expression of CRP and IL-6 in the PICC group was lower than that in the CVC group (P < 0.05). The CRP and IL-6 levels of patients in both groups were higher than those before treatment (P < 0.05); the tolerance of PICC group was higher than that of the CVC group (P < 0.05).
conclusionThe application of PICC in parenteral nutrition support for colorectal cancer can improve the nutritional status of patients with few adverse reactions and high tolerance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34540119PMC8430123W3200298883What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.