Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34540100›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2021

A comparative study of bilateral and unilateral early sucking within 2 hours of delivery on lactation.

Guoxia Zhou, Jun Han, Wenling Zhao, Xiaoqin Xu

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of translational research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Guoxia ZhouDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Jiaozhou Central Hospital of Qingdao Shandong 266300, China.
Jun HanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Qingdao Eighth People's Hospital Qingdao 266100, Shandong, China.
Wenling ZhaoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Jiaolai Town Central Health Center of Jiaozhou City Jiaozhou 266300, Shandong, China.
Xiaoqin XuDepartment of Radiology, Taizhou Municipal Hospital Taizhou 318000, Zhejiang, China.
Shuozhou Central Hospital · CNQingdao Eighth People's Hospital · CNTaizhou Municipal Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study explored and analyzed the effects of bilateral and unilateral early sucking within 2 h after delivery on lactation.

methodsFrom August 2019 to August 2020, 392 primiparas with full-term, singleton, natural delivery, and normal breast conditions were submitted to the Obstetrics Department of our hospital and were enrolled as the research subjects. The subjects were randomly divided into an experimental group and a control group, with 196 in each group. Both groups implemented early sucking with the assistance of a midwife within 2 h after delivery. The experimental group conducted bilateral breast sucking and the control group received unilateral sucking. The onset time of colostrum, the lactation volume, and the prolactin levels at 6 h, 24 h, 48 h, and 72 h after delivery, including neonatal urination and incidence of complications were compared between the two groups.

resultsThe onset time of colostrum in the experimental group was much earlier than that in the control group with a statistically significant difference (P<0.05). The postpartum filling time of the experimental group was shorter than that of the control group, with a statistically significant difference (P<0.05). There was a statistically insignificant difference in the distribution of lactation yield between the two groups at 6 h of postpartum (

conclusionThe effect of bilateral early lactation within 2 h after delivery is superior to that of unilateral early lactation, which is worthy of clinical application.

Indexed as

Bilateral early suckinglactation volumeunilateral early sucking

Identifiers

PMID34540100
PMCPMC8430129
OpenAlexW3200224704

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.