ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2021
Predisposing factors and effect of bundle nursing in PICC-related upper extremity deep venous thrombosis in patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma undergoing chemotherapy.
Article in American journal of translational research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effects of Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC) Catheterization Nursing on Bloodstream Infection in Peripheral Central Venous Catheters in Lung Cancer: A Single-Center, Retrospective Study.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2022Trial
- Development and preliminary validation of a PICC-related venous thrombosis risk prediction model for cancer patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis predominantly based on Chinese populations.Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing · 2026Review
- Construction and validation of a nomogram prediction model for the catheter-related thrombosis risk of central venous access devices in patients with cancer: a prospective machine learning study.Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis · 2025Article
- Biomarkers Associated with Thrombosis in Patients with Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo explore the effects of bundle nursing on PICC-related upper extremity deep venous thrombosis (PICC-UEDVT) in patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) who are undergoing chemotherapy, and contributing factors toward PICC-UEDVT.
methods370 NHL patients undergoing chemotherapy in the Department of Hematology were selected prospectively and randomized into a control group (receiving routine nursing) and an observation group (receiving bundle nursing) using random number method. There were 185 patients in each group. The incidence of PICC-UEDVT and satisfaction rate towards nursing were calculated and risk factors for PICC-UEDVT were explored in the two groups.
resultsThe incidence of PICC-UEDVT was lower in the observation group (18 patients, 9.73%) than that of the control group (35 patients, 18.92%; P<0.05); the satisfaction rate towards nursing was higher in the observation group than the control group (P<0.05). Tumor stage, ECOG score >2, hemoglobin <100 g/L, and D-dimer >0.5 mg/L were factors that contributed to the occurrence of PICC-UEDVT in NHL patients (P<0.05).
conclusionTumor stage, ECOG score >2, reduced hemoglobin, and increased D-dimer levels are predisposing factors for PICC-UEDVT in NHL patients. However, bundle nursing can reduce the incidence of PICC-UEDVT and increase the satisfaction rate towards nursing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34540095PMC8430105W3199861896What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.