ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2021
Effect of the intensive psychological nursing on adverse mood and quality of life in patients with cervical cancer.
Article in American journal of translational research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Effective Analysis of Multichannel Functional Electrical Stimulation plus Early Rehabilitation Training for Hemiplegic Patients after Stroke.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate the effect of intensive psychological nursing on the adverse mood and quality of life in patients with cervical cancer (CC).
methods100 CC patients admitted to our hospital from January 2019 to January 2020 were enrolled and randomly allocated into two groups, namely the control group (n=50) and the experimental group (n=50). Patients in the control group and experimental group were given general nursing and intensive psychological nursing, respectively. The two groups were compared with respect to self-rating anxiety scale (SAS), self-rating depressive scale (SDS) scores, quality of life index (QLI) scores and mental status scale in non-psychiatric settings (MSSNS) scores, effective rate of nursing and the incidence of adverse reactions.
resultsThe experimental group displayed a statistically significant increase in the QLI scores as compared with the control group (P < 0.05); The SAS, SDS scores, and MSSNS scores were found to be markedly lower in the experimental group than in the control group (P < 0.05); The effective rate of nursing was notably higher in the experimental group (P < 0.05); Regarding adverse reactions, the experimental group was markedly lower compared with the control group (P < 0.05).
conclusionIntensive psychological nursing significantly improves the psychological state and quality of life for CC patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34540089PMC8430170What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.