ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2021
Small incision phacoemulsification with topical anesthesia during perioperative period: nursing experience and its application.
Article in American journal of translational research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo investigate the perioperative clinical nursing experience and application effect of small incision phacoemulsification with topical anesthesia.
methodsRetrospectively analysis of 126 patients who came to our hospital for small incision phacoemulsification with topical anesthesia from November 2018 to November 2019. These patients were randomly divided into a study group and a control group, with 63 patients in each group. Patients from both groups underwent small incision phacoemulsification with topical anesthesia. The control group used routine nursing care during the perioperative period, and the study group used comprehensive nursing care. The clinical intervention effects of the two groups were compared.
resultsThe visual acuity of the two groups of patients after intervention was significantly improved (P<0.001), and the visual acuity of the study group after intervention was significantly better than that of the control group (P<0.001); the astigmatism of the study group after intervention was obviously lower (P<0.001); the Self-rating Anxiety Scale (SAS) and Self-Rating Depression Scale (SDS) scores of the two groups of patients after intervention were significantly lower than those before the intervention, and the decrease of SAS and SDS scores of the study group were more significant (P<0.001); The clinical nursing satisfaction of the study group was significantly higher than that of the control group (P<0.05); the postoperative complication rate of the study group was significantly lower than that of the control group (P<0.05); the cataract knowledge scores of the two groups of patients after intervention were both significantly higher than before the intervention, and the increase of cataract knowledge score of the study group was more remarkable (P<0.001).
conclusionThe comprehensive nursing mode used in small incision phacoemulsification with topical anesthesia for cataract extraction can effectively improve the patient's visual acuity, reduce the astigmatism, and have a lower incidence of postoperative complications, which has high clinical application value.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34540067PMC8430141W3199524554What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.