ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2021
Influence of a systematic nursing mode on the quality of life and pain of patients with chronic sinusitis and nasal polyps after endoscopic sinus surgery.
Article in American journal of translational research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effects of comprehensive nursing intervention on the postoperative gastrointestinal function and complications in patients undergoing endoscopic polypectomy.American journal of translational research · 2026Article
- Effect of microenvironment theory-based nursing on prognosis in intensive care unit patients with postoperative severe acute pancreatitis.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo explore the influence of a systematic nursing mode on the quality of life and pain of patients with chronic sinusitis and nasal polyps (CSNP) after endoscopic sinus surgery.
methodsIn this prospective study, a total of 114 patients with CSNP who were admitted to our hospital were randomly divided into an observation group (n=57) and a control group (n=57) by a random number table. The control group was given routine nursing, and the observation group was given systemic nursing. In this study, we compared the two groups of patients with visual analogue scale (VAS) scores, self-rating anxiety scale (SAS) scores, the complication rate, quality of life, quality of sleep, and patients' satisfaction with nursing services.
resultsThe VAS scores of postoperative pain in the observation group were significantly lower than those in the control group (P<0.001). The SAS scores of patients in the observation group were markedly lower than those in the control group (P<0.001). The rate of complications such as periorbital bruising, nasal adhesions, and cerebrospinal fluid rhinorrhea was significantly lower in the observation group than that in the control group (P<0.05). The physical function, general health, social function, emotional role, and mental health of the observation group were markedly higher than those of the control group (all P<0.05). The sleep quality scores of patients in the observation group were significantly lower than those in the control group (all P<0.05). The observation group's satisfaction with systemic nursing was significantly higher than that of the control group (P<0.05).
conclusionThe systemic nursing model applied to patients undergoing nasal endoscopic surgery for CSNP showed remarkable results. It relieved patients' anxiety symptoms, reduced postoperative pain and the complication rate, improved patients' quality of sleep and life, increased patient satisfaction. The systemic nursing model was worthy of clinical promotion and application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34540065PMC8430156W3201056049What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.