ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2021
Analysis on application effects of RAID quality improvement model in closed-loop management of central retinal artery occlusion nursing.
Article in American journal of translational research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study aimed to analyze the clinical value of applying RAID quality improvement model in closed-loop management of central retinal artery occlusion (CRAO) nursing.
methodsTwelve ophthalmic nurses were trained. Soon afterwards, their related knowledge, operation and scene simulation test scores before and after training were examined and compared. Before and after training, 20 CRAO patients who admitted to the second ward of ophthalmology (Ophthalmology Section 2) of our hospital were included into control group and research group. The former applied routine management, while the latter employed RAID quality improvement model.
resultsBefore intervention, the ESCA scores and the time window of first-aid of the two groups had no significant difference (all P>0.05). While after intervention, the scores of the research group were dramatically improved; the self-care skills, health knowledge, self-responsibility and self-awareness were obviously higher than those of the control group (all P<0.05); the time window of first-aid in the research group was remarkably shorter than that before intervention, dramatically higher than that in the control group (32.34±8.14 vs. 49.46±8.13; P<0.05). After nursing, the overall satisfaction of patients in the research group (95.00%) was higher than that in the control group (70.00%; P<0.05). Meanwhile, compared with those before training, the examination scores of related knowledge and skills of ophthalmic nurses after training were obviously improved (all P<0.05). The incidence of complications in the research group was 5.00%, while that in the control group was 30.00%. The indexes in the research group were lower than those in the control group, with statistically remarkable differences (P<0.05).
conclusionRAID quality improvement model is effective in closed-loop management of CRAO nursing, which can effectively improve the quality of nursing for specific diseases and control related indicators. Hence, it's worthy to be promoted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34540051PMC8430191What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.