ArticleOncology letters2021
A study on the clinical value of
Article in Oncology letters, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Primary renal parenchymal squamous cell carcinoma involving the renal pelvis: a case report and review of the literature.Urology case reports · 2025Article
- Primary parenchymal squamous cell carcinoma of the kidney: A case report.World journal of clinical cases · 2025Article
- Circulating Tumor DNA in Cervical Cancer: Clinical Utility and Medico-Legal Perspectives.Oncology research · 2025Review
- Primary squamous cell carcinoma of renal parenchyma: A case report and literature review.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Article
- Squamous Cell Carcinoma Antigen: Clinical Application and Research Status.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cervical cancer (CC) is the most common female genital tract malignancy, with repercussions on the psychophysiological health of female patients. Patients with CC are faced with a high risk of postoperative recurrence and metastases. The present study aimed to evaluate the clinical value of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) combined with serum squamous cell carcinoma antigen (SCC-Ag) in the diagnosis of postoperative recurrence/metastases in patients with early stage CC. This was a prospective follow-up study on 246 patients who received surgery for early stage CC. The results of clinical follow-up and pathological examination were taken as the gold standard. The diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve were calculated for PET/CT, serum SCC-Ag determination and the combined PET/CT and serum SCC-Ag method. Results demonstrated that 90.11% patients completed the follow-up, and the median follow-up time was 22 months (range, 7-42 months). Tumor recurrence or metastasis was confirmed in a total of 137 patients (55.7%), including 18 deaths. The diagnostic sensitivity of PET/CT scan combined with serum SCC-Ag determination for postoperative metastases/recurrence in patients with early stage CC was 93.43% (95% CI, 0.875-0.967). The specificity was 92.67% (95% CI, 0.856-0.965), the positive predictive value was 94.12% (95% CI, 0.884-0.972), the negative predictive value was 91.81% (95% CI, 0.846-0.959) and the area under the ROC curve was 0.930±0.019 (95% CI, 0.893-0.968; P<0.001). The results also revealed that the serum SCC-Ag level was positively correlated with SUVmax (r=0.458; P<0.001). The results from the present study demonstrated that for patients with early metaphase CC, PET/CT scan combined with serum SCC-Ag determination during the follow-up was capable of earlier, more comprehensive and more accurate detection of recurrence/metastatic lesions, which is of high clinical application value.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.