Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34539663›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in immunology2021

Targeting Indoleamine 2,3-Dioxygenase 1: Fighting Cancers

Chao Yang, Chan-Tat Ng, Dan Li, Lei Zhang

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Chao YangNational Engineering Research Center For Marine Aquaculture, Institute of Innovation & Application, Zhejiang Ocean University, Zhoushan, China.
Chan-Tat NgDepartment of Psychology, National Chengchi University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Dan LiState Key Laboratory of Southwestern Chinese Medicine Resources, School of Pharmacy, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China.
Lei ZhangSericultural Research Institute, College of Biotechnology, Jiangsu University of Science and Technology, Zhenjiang, China.
Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine · CNJiangsu University of Science and Technology · CNNational Chengchi University · TWZhejiang Ocean University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The connection between indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase 1 (IDO1) and tumour dormancy - a quiescent state of tumour cells which has been consistently linked to metastasis and cancer recurrence - is rarely discussed despite the pivotal role of IDO1 in cancer development and progression. Whilst the underlying mechanisms of IDO1-mediated dormancy are elusive, we summarize the IDO1 pathways which potentially contribute to dormancy in this review. Critically, distinct IDO1 activities are involved in dormancy initiation and maintenance; factors outside the well-studied IDO1/kynurenine/aryl hydrocarbon receptor axis, including the mammalian target of rapamycin and general control nonderepressible 2, appear to be implicated in dormancy. We also discuss various strategies for cancer treatment

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, EnzymologicAnimalsBasic Helix-Loop-Helix ProteinsHumansIndoleamine-Pyrrole 2,3,-DioxygenaseKynurenineNeoplasmsReceptors, Aryl HydrocarbonSignal TransductionTryptophanAHR protein, humanBasic Helix-Loop-Helix ProteinsIDO1 protein, humanIndoleamine-Pyrrole 2,3,-DioxygenaseKynurenineReceptors, Aryl HydrocarbonTryptophanaryl hydrocarbon receptorIDO1 regulationimmunosuppressionkynureninenanotechnologytumour dormancy

Identifiers

PMID34539663
PMCPMC8446437
OpenAlexW3196474089

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.