ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2021
Influence of Environmental Factors on the Variability of Archaeal Communities in a Karst Wetland.
Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Archaea are ubiquitous and play an important role in elemental cycles in Earth's biosphere; but little is known about their diversity, distribution, abundance, and impact in karst environments. The present study investigated the effect of environmental factors on the variability of archaeal communities in the sediment of the Huixian karst wetland, the largest karst wetland in South China. Sediment cores were obtained from four sampling sites with different water depths and macrophyte inhabitants in both the winter of 2016 and the summer of 2018. The community analysis was based on PacBio sequencing and quantitative PCR of the archaeal 16S rRNA gene. The results showed that Euryarchaeota (57.4%) and Bathyarchaeota (38.7%) were dominant in all the samples. Methanogenic Methanosarcinales (25.1%) and Methanomicrobiales (13.7%), and methanotrophic archaea ANME-2d (9.0%) were the dominant Euryarchaeota; MCG-11 (16.5%), MCG-6 (9.1%), and MCG-5b (5.5%) were the dominant Bathyarchaeota. The community composition remained stable between summer and winter, and the vertical distributions of the archaeal phyla conformed to two patterns among the four sampling sites. In the winter samples, the archaeal 16S rRNA gene abundance was approximately 1.0E+10 copies/g of wet sediment and the Shannon index was 7.3±5, which were significantly higher than in the summer samples and in other karst environments. A correlation analysis showed that the moisture content and pH were the factors that mostly affected the archaeal communities. The prevalence of nitrate in the summer may be a key factor causing a significant decrease in archaeal abundance and diversity. Two features specific to karst environments, calcium-richness and weak alkalescence of the water supplies, may benefit the prevalence of bathyarchaeotal subgroups MCG-11, MCG-5b, and MCG-6. These results suggest that in karst wetlands, most of the archaea belong to clades that have significant roles in carbon turnover; their composition remains stable, but their abundance and diversity vary significantly from season to season.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.