The Prominent Deck B Phenomenon in Schizophrenia: An Empirical Study on Iowa Gambling Task.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

1. Iowa Gambling Task performance in individuals with schizophrenia: the role of general versus specific cognitive abilities.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2024
   Article
2. The Relationship Between Suicidal Behavior, Neurocognitive Functions, and Insight in Patients with Schizophrenia.Psychiatry and clinical psychopharmacology · 2023
   Article
3. Reanalyzing the Maia and McClelland (2004) Empirical Data: How Do Participants Really Behave in the Iowa Gambling Task?Frontiers in psychiatry · 2022
   Review
4. The Die Is Cast: Decision-Making Under Risk and Under Ambiguity in Schizophrenia and Alcohol Use Disorder.Clinical psychology & psychotherapy
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as