ArticleAction research (London)2021
Choosing strategies that work from the start: A mixed methods study to understand effective development of community-academic partnerships.
Article in Action research (London), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluating Partnership Quality and Outcomes Within an Autism Community Collaborative.Journal of autism and developmental disorders · 2026Article
- Community perspectives on partnering with early-stage investigators in pilot research.Research involvement and engagement · 2026Article
- 'You feel part of something bigger': Stakeholders' experiences of a long-term community-academic participatory research partnership.Autism : the international journal of research and practice · 2025Article
- 'There has to be some chemistry there': an interpretive description exploring the experiences, motivations and dynamics of partnered child health research.Research involvement and engagement · 2025Article
- Bridging the gap: empowering patients as research partners through a structured training program.Research involvement and engagement · 2025Article
- Community-Engaged Approach to Improve Food Access and Consumption of Fruits and Vegetables in a Rural Appalachian Community.Nutrients · 2025Article
- Bridging the divide: barriers and facilitators to equitable community-academic partnerships in health research.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Using action research and a community-academic partnership to understand clinical trial participation: a patient-centered perspective.Research involvement and engagement · 2024Article
- Autism Caregiver Coaching in Africa (ACACIA): Protocol for a type 1-hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial.PloS one · 2024Article
- Autism Caregiver Coaching in Africa (ACACIA): Protocol for a type 1-hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2023Article
- Understanding collaborative implementation between community and academic partners in a complex intervention: a qualitative descriptive study.BMC health services research · 2023Article
- Fidelity to the ACT SMART Toolkit: an instrumental case study of implementation strategy fidelity.Implementation science communications · 2023Article
- Preliminary effectiveness of the ACT SMART implementation toolkit: facilitating evidence-based practice implementation in community-based autism organizations.International journal of developmental disabilities · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Community-academic partnerships are believed to increase the effectiveness and feasibility of action research. While factors facilitating and hindering community-academic partnerships have been identified, their influence on the collaborative process is unknown, especially during community-academic partnership initiation and development. This explanatory sequential mixed methods study (quantitative→QUALITATIVE) evaluated perspectives of members in an autism community-academic partnership to determine frequently endorsed and influential factors facilitating and hindering the collaborative process during the community-academic partnership's development. Participants (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.