Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34539171›Full record

ArticleHuman and ecological risk assessment : HERA2020

Paraquat exposure of backpack sprayers in agricultural area in Thailand.

Pajaree Konthonbut, Pornpimol Kongtip, Noppanun Nankongnab, Mathuros Tipayamongkholgul, Witaya Yoosook, Susan Woskie

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human and ecological risk assessment : HERA, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Insecticide Filtration Efficiency of Respiratory Protective Equipment Commonly Worn by Farmers in Thailand.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Pajaree KonthonbutDepartment of Occupational Health and Safety, Faculty of Public Health, Mahidol University, Center of Excellence on Environmental Health and Toxicology, Bangkok, Thailand.
Pornpimol KongtipDepartment of Occupational Health and Safety, Faculty of Public Health, Mahidol University, Center of Excellence on Environmental Health and Toxicology, Bangkok, Thailand.
Noppanun NankongnabDepartment of Occupational Health and Safety, Faculty of Public Health, Mahidol University, Center of Excellence on Environmental Health and Toxicology, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-7256-3385
Mathuros TipayamongkholgulDepartment of Epidemiology, Faculty of Public Health, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Witaya YoosookFaculty of Public Health, Mahasarakham University, Mahasarakham, Thailand.
Susan WoskieDepartment of Public Health, Zuckerberg College of Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Lowell, Lowell, MA, USA.
Mahidol University · THMahasarakham University · THUniversity of Massachusetts Lowell · US

Funding

1/2-GEOHealth Hub: Improving Agricultural Health in Southeast Asia-ThailandU01TW010091 · FIC · MAHIDOL UNIVERSITY · PI KONGTIP, PORNPIMOL, WOSKIE, SUSAN · 2015 to 2020
$1.8M
2/2-GEOHealth Hub-Improving Agricultural Health in Southeast Asia-USU2RTW010088 · FIC · UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS LOWELL · PI KONGTIP, PORNPIMOL, WOSKIE, SUSAN · 2015 to 2019
$1.4M
FIC NIH HHS U01 TW010091FIC NIH HHS U2R TW010088
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Thai agriculturists heavily used paraquat in agricultural areas to control weed and grasses. This study determined paraquat exposure among backpack sprayers in Thailand and identified determinants of occupational exposure. Breathing zone air and dermal samples were collected from 57 backpack sprayers while spraying. Spot urine samples were collected on the day before spraying, end of spraying event and the next day after spraying. The subjects were interviewed about general demographics, agricultural activities, pesticide application and personal protective equipment used while applying paraquat. Paraquat concentrations in urine samples, air samples and dermal samples were determined by HPLC with a fluorescence detector. The median IQR of urinary paraquat concentrations on the day before spraying, end of spraying event, the next day after spraying were 2.51 (0.81-5.59), 8.23 (3.3-13.73) and 3.48 (1.03-8.19) μg/g creatinine, respectively. Concentrations of air samples and total dermal exposures were 5.15 (2.28-10.12) μg/m

Indexed as

agriculturedermal exposureinhalation exposureParaquatThailand

Identifiers

PMID34539171
PMCPMC8448200
OpenAlexW2986089173

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.