ArticlePsychotherapeut2021
[Skills fOr Life Adjustment and Resilience Program].
Article in Psychotherapeut, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Dealing with the COVID-19 pandemic in Europe: five lessons from the European Society for Traumatic Stress Studies.European journal of psychotraumatology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAfter catastrophes, trauma and other highly stressful experiences, a proportion of individuals develop mental illness, while another proportion exhibit persisting subclinical distress that limits psychosocial functioning. Individuals with persisting subclinical distress rarely receive psychosocial support services. AIM OF THE STUDY: This paper presents the Skills fOr Life Adjustment and Resilience (SOLAR) program, a brief intervention developed for people with persistent subclinical distress following catastrophes and other severe stressors. In addition, we report the preliminary findings of a pilot study on the satisfaction with the program in face-to-face and video conferencing formats among people affected by traumatic experiences.
methodsAn international consortium of catastrophe and trauma experts developed the SOLAR program. It includes five weekly group sessions in which behavioral therapy elements are taught. In a pilot study 15 participants received the SOLAR group program in a face-to-face format, and 15 received the program via video conferencing during the first weeks of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. After program completion, we assessed satisfaction with the program using the German version of the client satisfaction questionnaire (CSQ-8).
resultsParticipants were "largely" to "very satisfied" with the SOLAR program. The satisfaction in the face-to-face group was slightly greater in all aspects than in the online group. The trainers rated the program as easy to implement.
conclusionThe SOLAR program represents a promising brief intervention for persistent subclinical distress after severe stressors, which should be further tested for its effectiveness in face-to-face or video conferencing formats. Practical recommendations for implementation are provided.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.