Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34538988›Full record

ArticleJournal of family therapy2022

Trainee life under COVID-19: A systemic case report.

Sarah Muddle, Hannah Rettie, Olivia Harris, Anna Lawes, Ross Robinson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of family therapy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Behavioral Health Trainee Satisfaction at the US Department of Veterans Affairs During the COVID-19 Pandemic.Federal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sarah MuddleDepartment of Psychology University of Bath Bath United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1023-1481
Hannah RettieDepartment of Psychology University of Bath Bath United Kingdom.
Olivia HarrisDepartment of Psychology University of Bath Bath United Kingdom.
Anna LawesDepartment of Psychology University of Bath Bath United Kingdom.
Ross RobinsonDepartment of Psychology University of Bath Bath United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has had implications for all of us. For those of us studying on clinical psychology doctorates, and similar psychotherapeutic training courses, this pandemic has led to some particular challenges. This article explores the experiences of a group of clinical psychology trainees, who are also completing intermediate systemic qualification, during the COVID-19 pandemic using a systemic case study approach. We consider the challenges we faced in relation to systemic theory and the intervention we would have used if we were clients in a family therapy clinic. This enabled us to reflect on the importance of self-reflexivity and self-care during these challenging times. Practitioner points: Using systemic thinking and ideas can help organisations make sense of how the system has had to adapt to working during a pandemic and can bring to light some of the challenges.During the pandemic and at other times of crisis, opportunities for students and staff to reflect together are likely to be beneficial.When working independently, as necessitated by the pandemic, finding ways to remain connected to our colleagues will be especially important.Providing opportunities for individuals to give feedback regarding their experiences and to influence organisational change will help individuals gain a sense of agency during a time when they are likely otherwise to feel disempowered.

Indexed as

clinical psychologyCOVID‐19systems theory

Identifiers

PMID34538988
PMCPMC8441812

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.