ArticleReumatologia2021
Plagiarism detection and prevention: a primer for researchers.
Article in Reumatologia, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Authors, beware of plagiarism in medical writing.Journal of postgraduate medicine · 2025Article
- Plagiarism in Publications: All about Being Fair!The Indian journal of radiology & imaging · 2025Article
- Advancing Research, Writing, and Publishing in Nursing: Addressing Challenges and Improving Standards.Journal of Korean medical science · 2024Review
- The Ability of ChatGPT in Paraphrasing Texts and Reducing Plagiarism: A Descriptive Analysis.JMIR medical education · 2024Article
- Ethical Considerations for AI Use in Healthcare Research.Healthcare informatics research · 2024Article
- NLP AI Models for Optimizing Medical Research: Demystifying the Concerns.Indian journal of surgical oncology · 2023Review
- Plagiarism: A Bird's Eye View.Journal of Korean medical science · 2023Review
- [Scientific integrity faces plagiarism fabricated with the ChatGPT].Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social · 2023Article
- Analysis of Retracted Publications in Medical Literature Due to Ethical Violations.Journal of Korean medical science · 2023Article
- A pilot study on the capability of artificial intelligence in preparation of patients' educational materials for Indian public health issues.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2023Article
- The Cultural Context of Plagiarism and Research Misconduct in the Asian Region.Journal of Korean medical science · 2023Review
- AI-generated research paper fabrication and plagiarism in the scientific community.Patterns (New York, N.Y.) · 2023Article
- Analysis of Retracted Publications in The Biomedical Literature from Turkey.Journal of Korean medical science · 2022Article
- Plagiarism in Non-Anglophone Countries: a Cross-sectional Survey of Researchers and Journal Editors.Journal of Korean medical science · 2021Article
- Artificial intelligence in medicine and research - the good, the bad, and the ugly.Saudi journal of anaesthesiaReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Plagiarism is an ethical misconduct affecting the quality, readability, and trustworthiness of scholarly publications. Improving researcher awareness of plagiarism of words, ideas, and graphics is essential for avoiding unacceptable writing practices. Global editorial associations have publicized their statements on strategies to clean literature from redundant, stolen, and misleading information. Consulting related documents is advisable for upgrading author instructions and warning plagiarists of academic and other consequences of the unethical conduct. A lack of creative thinking and poor academic English skills are believed to compound most instances of redundant and "copy-and-paste" writing. Plagiarism detection software largely relies on reporting text similarities. However, manual checks are required to reveal inappropriate referencing, copyright violations, and substandard English writing. Medical researchers and authors may improve their writing skills and avoid the same errors by consulting the list of retractions due to plagiarism which are tracked on the PubMed platform and discussed on the Retraction Watch blog.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.