ArticleJournal of food science and technology2021
Underutilized finger millet crop for starch extraction, characterization, and utilization in the development of flexible thin film.
Article in Journal of food science and technology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Comprehensive Review of Starches From Diverse Millets: Composition, Structure, Functionality, and Strategies for Genetic Improvement.Comprehensive reviews in food science and food safety · 2026Review
- Ultrasound-assisted isolation, quality characterization of finger millet (Journal of food science and technology · 2025Article
- Article
- Effects of biodegradation of starch-nanocellulose films incorporated with black tea extract on soil quality.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Application and functional properties of millet starch: Wet milling extraction process and different modification approaches.Heliyon · 2024Review
- Wheat end-use quality: State of art, genetics, genomics-assisted improvement, future challenges, and opportunities.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Three different varieties of finger millets (VL-315, VL-324, and VL-347) cultivated in Uttrakhand, India, were used to extract high purity starch using the alkali soaking approach and investigated physicochemical and structural properties. VL-315, VL-324, and VL-347, contain 78 ± 0.35%, 79 ± 0.35%, and 87 ± 0.35% starch, respectively, of which 39.03 ± 0.35%, 37.2 ± 0.35%, and 33.5 ± 0.35% are the amylose contents, respectively. Chemical composition analysis exhibited the level of ash and moisture content in the dry basis of 0.0031 ± 0.01% to 0.035 ± 0.05%, and 12.52 ± 0.8% to 12.92 ± 0.2%, respectively. The solubility and swelling range of VL-315 is 1.3-4.3% and 16.54-10.3 (g/g), respectively, which significantly differ from VL-324 and VL-347. XRD analysis revealed that extracted starch showed a typical A-type crystalline network with a crystallinity range of 17.7-19.3%, which remarkably influenced retro gradation tendencies of starch. SEM demonstrated that extracted starch granules are polyhedral shape with a smooth surface. Finger millet starch has enormous potential in the development of starch-based edible film and coating on food items. In the present work, extracted finger millet starch was studied with the aim of developing a thin and flexible food packaging film. From the results, it was observed that the fabricated films had excellent functional properties, including solubility, swelling index, and water vapor permeability, which could eliminate petroleum-based packaging materials, and gives food materials an extra shelf life, and improve overall food quality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.