Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34538283›Full record

ArticlePsychological medicine2023

Psychological responses to the COVID-19 pandemic are heterogeneous but have stabilised over time: 1 year longitudinal follow-up of the COVID-19 Psychological Research Consortium (C19PRC) study.

Mark Shevlin, Sarah Butter, Orla McBride, Jamie Murphy, Jilly Gibson-Miller, Todd K Hartman, Liat Levita, Liam Mason, Anton P Martinez, Ryan McKay and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychological medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Public discourse on mental health: a critical view.Journal of psychiatry & neuroscience : JPN
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Mark ShevlinDepartment of Psychology, Ulster University, Coleraine, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6262-5223
Sarah ButterUniversity of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Orla McBrideDepartment of Psychology, Ulster University, Coleraine, UK.
Jamie MurphyDepartment of Psychology, Ulster University, Coleraine, UK.
Jilly Gibson-MillerUniversity of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Todd K HartmanUniversity of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Liat LevitaUniversity of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Liam MasonUniversity College London, London, UK.
Anton P MartinezUniversity of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Ryan McKayRoyal Holloway, University of London, London, UK.
Thomas V A StocksUniversity of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Kate M BennettLiverpool University, Liverpool, UK.
Philip HylandMaynooth University, Maynooth, Ireland.
Frédérique VallieresTrinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Richard P BentallUniversity of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

COVID-19Follow-Up StudiesHumansLongitudinal StudiesPandemics

Identifiers

PMID34538283
PMCPMC8485012

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.