Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34538277›Full record

ArticlePerioperative medicine (London, England)2021

Influence of sugammadex versus neostigmine for neuromuscular block reversal on the incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Jia-Feng Wang, Zhen-Zhen Zhao, Zheng-Yu Jiang, Hui-Xing Liu, Xiao-Ming Deng

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Perioperative medicine (London, England), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06210165 (Effects of Sugammadex and Conventional Reversal on Lung Function in Laparoscopic Abdominal Surgery), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06210165 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Effects of Sugammadex and Conventional Reversal on Lung Function in Laparoscopic Abdominal Surgery

TypeinterventionalSponsorRhendra Hardy Mohamad ZainiRan2022 to 2024Enrolled80ConditionsAtelectasis, Postoperative, Pulmonary Function, Newborn, AbnormalArmsSugammadex, Neostigmine and atropine
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jia-Feng Wang *Faculty of Anesthesiology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, 168 Changhai Road, Shanghai, 200433, China.
Zhen-Zhen Zhao *
Zheng-Yu JiangFaculty of Anesthesiology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, 168 Changhai Road, Shanghai, 200433, China.
Hui-Xing LiuDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Peking University People's Hospital, No. 11 Xizhimen South Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100044, China.
Xiao-Ming DengFaculty of Anesthesiology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, 168 Changhai Road, Shanghai, 200433, China. deng_x@yahoo.com.
Second Military Medical University · CNPeking University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe influence of sugammadex for reversal of neuromuscular block (NMB) on postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs), compared with neostigmine, remains to be determined. We performed a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to compare the incidence of PPCs between patients who received sugammadex versus neostigmine.

methodsRelevant studies were obtained by searching the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases. A random effects model incorporating the potential heterogeneity was used to pool the results.

resultsFourteen RCTs including 1478 adult patients who underwent surgeries with general anesthesia were included, and of these, 753 received sugammadex and 725 received neostigmine for reversal of NMB. The pooled results showed that sugammadex was associated with a lower risk of overall PPCs compared to neostigmine (odds ratio [OR]: 0.62, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.43-0.89, p = 0.01; I

conclusionsCompared with neostigmine, the use of sugammadex for reversal of NMB was associated with a lower risk of PPCs, mainly due to a lower incidence of postoperative respiratory failure with the use of sugammadex.

Indexed as

Meta-analysisNeostigmineNeuromuscular blockPostoperative pulmonary complicationsSugammadex

Identifiers

PMID34538277
PMCPMC8451127
OpenAlexW3199170423

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.