Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34538267›Full record

ArticleBiotechnology for biofuels2021

Monitoring of seven industrial anaerobic digesters supplied with biochar.

Kerstin Heitkamp, Adriel Latorre-Pérez, Sven Nefigmann, Helena Gimeno-Valero, Cristina Vilanova, Efri Jahmad, Christian Abendroth

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biotechnology for biofuels, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Kerstin Heitkamp *BioEnergie Verbund e.V, Jena, Germany.
Adriel Latorre-Pérez *Darwin Bioprospecting Excellence, S.L. Parc Cientific Universitat de Valencia, Paterna, Valencia, Spain.
Sven NefigmannLUCRAT GmbH, Steinfurt, Germany.
Helena Gimeno-ValeroDarwin Bioprospecting Excellence, S.L. Parc Cientific Universitat de Valencia, Paterna, Valencia, Spain.
Cristina VilanovaDarwin Bioprospecting Excellence, S.L. Parc Cientific Universitat de Valencia, Paterna, Valencia, Spain.
Efri JahmadRobert Boyle Institut e.V, Jena, Germany.
Christian AbendrothInstitute of Waste Management and Circular Economy, Technische Universität Dresden, Pirna, Germany. christian.abendroth@tu-dresden.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3940-9124

Funding

Bundesministerium für Umwelt, Naturschutz, Bau und Reaktorsicherheit 16EXI4016ABundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Energie 005-1907-0285Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Energie 16KN070129Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades DI-17-09613
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecent research articles indicate that direct interspecies electron transfer (DIET) is an alternative metabolic route for methanogenic archaea that improves microbial methane productivity. It has been shown that multiple conductive materials such as biochar can be supplemented to anaerobic digesters to increase the rate of DIET. However, the industrial applicability, as well as the impact of such supplements on taxonomic profiles, has not been sufficiently assessed to date.

resultsSeven industrial biogas plants were upgraded with a shock charge of 1.8 kg biochar per ton of reactor content and then 1.8 kg per ton were added to the substrate for one year. A joint analysis for all seven systems showed a decreasing trend for the concentration of acetic acid (p < 0.0001), propionic acid (p < 0.0001) and butyric acid (p = 0.0022), which was significant in all cases. Quantification of the cofactor F420 using fluorescence microscopy showed a reduction in methanogenic archaea by up to a power of ten. Methanogenic archaea could grow within the biochar, even if the number of cells was 4 times less than in the surrounding sludge. 16S-rRNA gene amplicon sequencing showed a higher microbial diversity in the biochar particles than in the sludge, as well as an accumulation of secondary fermenters and halotolerant bacteria. Taxonomic profiles indicate microbial electroactivity, and show the frequent occurrence of Methanoculleus, which has not been described in this context before.

conclusionsOur results shed light on the interplay between biochar particles and microbial communities in anaerobic digesters. Both the microbial diversity and the absolute frequency of the microorganisms involved were significantly changed between sludge samples and biochar particles. This is particularly important against the background of microbial process monitoring. In addition, it could be shown that biochar is suitable for reducing the content of inhibitory, volatile acids on an industrial scale.

Indexed as

Anaerobic digestionBiocharDIETMicrobial communities

Identifiers

PMID34538267
PMCPMC8451101

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.