Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34538236›Full record

ArticleBMC gastroenterology2021

Ileostomy or ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis: patient participation and decisional needs.

Jessica N Cohan, Elissa M Ozanne, Rebecca K Hofer, Yvonne M Kelly, Anna Kata, Craig Larsen, Emily Finlayson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC gastroenterology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Restorative versus non-restorative total proctocolectomy: Who doesn't pouch and how do they do?Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Jessica N CohanDepartment of Surgery, University of Utah, 30 North 1900 East, Salt Lake City, UT, 84132, USA. Jessica.Cohan@hsc.utah.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5461-4716
Elissa M OzanneDepartment of Population Health Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Rebecca K HoferDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Yvonne M KellyDepartment of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Anna KataDepartment of Surgery, Medstar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, USA.
Craig LarsenDepartment of Surgery, New York Presbyterian-Queens, Flushing, NY, USA.
Emily FinlaysonDepartment of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
University of California, San Francisco · USUniversity of Utah · USGeorgetown University · USNew York Hospital Queens · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUp to 30% of patients with ulcerative colitis will undergo surgery resulting in an ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) or permanent end ileostomy (EI). We aimed to understand how patients decide between these two options.

methodsWe performed semi-structured interviews with ulcerative colitis patients who underwent surgery. Areas of questioning included the degree to which patients participated in decision-making, challenges experienced, and suggestions for improving the decision-making process. We analyzed the data using a directed content and thematic approach.

resultsWe interviewed 16 patients ranging in age from 28 to 68 years. Nine were male, 10 underwent IPAA, and 6 underwent EI. When it came to participation in decision-making, 11 patients felt independently responsible for decision-making, 3 shared decision-making with the surgeon, and 2 experienced surgeon-led decision-making. Themes regarding challenges during decision-making included lack of support from family, lack of time to discuss options with the surgeon, and the overwhelming complexity of the decision. Themes for ways to improve decision-making included the need for additional information, the desire for peer education, and earlier consultation with a surgeon. Only 3 patients were content with the information used to decide about surgery.

conclusionsPatients with ulcerative colitis who need surgery largely experience independence when deciding between IPAA and EI, but struggle with inadequate educational information and social support. Patients may benefit from early access to surgeons and peer guidance to enhance independence in decision-making. Preoperative educational materials describing surgical complications and postoperative lifestyle could improve decision-making and facilitate discussions with loved ones.

Indexed as

Colitis, UlcerativeColonic PouchesProctocolectomy, RestorativeAdultAgedAnastomosis, SurgicalHumansIleostomyMaleMiddle AgedPatient ParticipationPostoperative ComplicationsTreatment OutcomeIleal pouch-anal anastomosisIleostomyQualitative researchShared decision makingUlcerative colitis

Identifiers

PMID34538236
PMCPMC8451075
OpenAlexW3199051712

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.