Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34538146›Full record

ArticlePhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2021

Land-use change and rodent-borne diseases: hazards on the shared socioeconomic pathways.

Gabriel E García-Peña, André V Rubio, Hugo Mendoza, Miguel Fernández, Matthew T Milholland, A Alonso Aguirre, Gerardo Suzán, Carlos Zambrana-Torrelio

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Preliminary molecular detection and characterization ofOne health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Epidemiology and infection · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Pathogens and planetary change.Nature reviews. Biodiversity · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Gabriel E García-PeñaCentro de Ciencias de la Complejidad, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad de México, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-3515-6908
André V RubioDepartamento de Ciencias Biológicas Animales, Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias y Pecuarias, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile.ORCID 0000-0001-7297-9535
Hugo MendozaDepartamento de Etología, Fauna Silvestre y Animales de Laboratorio, Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad de México, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-0456-3615
Miguel FernándezNatureServe, Arlington, VA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8301-1340
Matthew T MilhollandUniversity of Maryland, AGNR-Environmental Science and Technology, College Park, MD, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9398-7243
A Alonso AguirreDepartment of Environmental Science and Policy, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9507-857X
Gerardo SuzánDepartamento de Etología, Fauna Silvestre y Animales de Laboratorio, Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad de México, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0003-2508-6376
Carlos Zambrana-TorrelioEcoHealth Alliance, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5614-7496

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Land-use change has a direct impact on species survival and reproduction, altering their spatio-temporal distributions. It acts as a selective force that favours the abundance and diversity of reservoir hosts and affects host-pathogen dynamics and prevalence. This has led to land-use change being a significant driver of infectious diseases emergence. Here, we predict the presence of rodent taxa and map the zoonotic hazard (potential sources of harm) from rodent-borne diseases in the short and long term (2025 and 2050). The study considers three different land-use scenarios based on the shared socioeconomic pathways narratives (SSPs): sustainable (SSP1-Representative Concentration Pathway (RCP) 2.6), fossil-fuelled development (SSP5-RCP 8.5) and deepening inequality (SSP4-RCP 6.0). We found that cropland expansion into forest and pasture may increase zoonotic hazards in areas with high rodent-species diversity. Nevertheless, a future sustainable scenario may not always reduce hazards. All scenarios presented high heterogeneity in zoonotic hazard, with high-income countries having the lowest hazard range. The SSPs narratives suggest that opening borders and reducing cropland expansion are critical to mitigate current and future zoonotic hazards globally, particularly in middle- and low-income economies. Our study advances previous efforts to anticipate the emergence of zoonotic diseases by integrating past, present and future information to guide surveillance and mitigation of zoonotic hazards at the regional and local scale. This article is part of the theme issue 'Infectious disease macroecology: parasite diversity and dynamics across the globe'.

Indexed as

Climate ChangeConservation of Natural ResourcesEcosystemHost-Pathogen InteractionsSocioeconomic FactorsAnimalsHost-Parasite InteractionsHumansRodent DiseasesZoonosesdisease riskemerging zoonotic diseasesenvironmental changeland-use scenariosRodentia

Identifiers

PMID34538146
PMCPMC8450622

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.