Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34538143›Full record

ArticlePhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2021

Forecasting parasite sharing under climate change.

Ignacio Morales-Castilla, Paula Pappalardo, Maxwell J Farrell, A Alonso Aguirre, Shan Huang, Alyssa-Lois M Gehman, Tad Dallas, Dominique Gravel, T Jonathan Davies

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Pathogens and planetary change.Nature reviews. Biodiversity · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Towards a phylogenetic ecology of plant pests and pathogens.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2021
    Review
  18. The ghost of hosts past: impacts of host extinction on parasite specificity.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2021
    Article
  19. Infectious disease macroecology: parasite diversity and dynamics across the globe.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ignacio Morales-CastillaUniversidad de Alcalá, GloCEE - Global Change Ecology and Evolution Research Group, Departamento de Ciencias de la Vida, 28805, Alcalá de Henares, Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-8570-9312
Paula PappalardoDepartment of Invertebrate Zoology, Smithsonian National Museum of Natural History, Washington, DC 20560, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0853-7681
Maxwell J FarrellDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-0452-6993
A Alonso AguirreDepartment of Environmental Science and Policy, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA 22030-4400, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9507-857X
Shan HuangSenckenberg Biodiversity and Climate Centre (SBiK-F), Senckenberganlage 25, Frankfurt (Main) 60325, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5055-1308
Alyssa-Lois M GehmanDepartment of Zoology, University of British Columbia, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-0595-9950
Tad DallasDepartment of Biological Sciences, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA 70806, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3328-9958
Dominique GravelDépartement de biologie, Université de Sherbrooke, 2500 Boul. de l'Université, Sherbroke, Canada J1K2R1.
T Jonathan DaviesDepartments of Botany and Forest and Conservation Sciences, University of British Columbia, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-3318-5948

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Species are shifting their distributions in response to climate change. This geographic reshuffling may result in novel co-occurrences among species, which could lead to unseen biotic interactions, including the exchange of parasites between previously isolated hosts. Identifying potential new host-parasite interactions would improve forecasting of disease emergence and inform proactive disease surveillance. However, accurate predictions of future cross-species disease transmission have been hampered by the lack of a generalized approach and data availability. Here, we propose a framework to predict novel host-parasite interactions based on a combination of niche modelling of future host distributions and parasite sharing models. Using the North American ungulates as a proof of concept, we show this approach has high cross-validation accuracy in over 85% of modelled parasites and find that more than 34% of the host-parasite associations forecasted by our models have already been recorded in the literature. We discuss potential sources of uncertainty and bias that may affect our results and similar forecasting approaches, and propose pathways to generate increasingly accurate predictions. Our results indicate that forecasting parasite sharing in response to shifts in host geographic distributions allow for the identification of regions and taxa most susceptible to emergent pathogens under climate change. This article is part of the theme issue 'Infectious disease macroecology: parasite diversity and dynamics across the globe'.

Indexed as

Climate ChangeHost-Parasite InteractionsModels, BiologicalAnimalsArtiodactylaForecastingNorth AmericaParasitologyPerissodactylaclimate changehost–parasite interactionsniche modellingNorth American ungulatesparasite sharing

Identifiers

PMID34538143
PMCPMC8450630

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.