Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34538099›Full record

ArticleAutism : the international journal of research and practice2022

Anthropomorphic tendencies in autism: A conceptual replication and extension of White and Remington (2019) and preliminary development of a novel anthropomorphism measure.

Rachel A Clutterbuck, Punit Shah, Hok Sze Leung, Mitchell J Callan, Natalia Gjersoe, Lucy A Livingston

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Autism : the international journal of research and practice, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. TechnologicalNature. Mental health · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Relationships between alexithymia, interoception, and emotional empathy in autism spectrum disorder.Autism : the international journal of research and practice · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Rachel A ClutterbuckUniversity of Bath, UK.
Punit ShahUniversity of Bath, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5497-4765
Hok Sze LeungUniversity of Bath, UK.
Mitchell J CallanUniversity of Bath, UK.
Natalia GjersoeUniversity of Bath, UK.
Lucy A LivingstonCardiff University, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8597-6525

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

lay abstractAnthropomorphism is the tendency to attribute human-like qualities (e.g. thoughts and feelings) to non-human entities (e.g. objects and weather systems). Research by White and Remington (2019) suggested that anthropomorphism is more common in autistic compared to neurotypical adults, which is interesting given that autistic individuals sometimes misunderstand the thoughts and feelings of other people. In this article, we re-examined the link between autism and anthropomorphism in a large sample of adults with varying degrees of autistic traits, with several important methodological advances on previous research. Across two studies, we found that individuals with more autistic traits reported greater anthropomorphic tendencies. As part of these analyses, we had to develop a new, refined measure of anthropomorphism, which showed better reliability and validity than the original measure. This measure will be useful in future autism-related research. Overall, advancing White and Remington's study, these findings help us to better understand individual differences in socially relevant processes, including those that may be enhanced in autism (e.g. anthropomorphism).

Indexed as

Autism Spectrum DisorderAutistic DisorderAdultEmotionsHumansReproducibility of Resultsanthropomorphismautismpersonificationsocial cognitiontheory of mind

Identifiers

PMID34538099
PMCPMC9014771

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.