Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34538073›Full record

Trial reportThe British journal of radiology2022

MRI-guided focal boost to dominant intraprostatic lesion using volumetric modulated arc therapy in prostate cancer. Results of a phase II trial.

Almudena Zapatero, Maria Roch, Pablo Castro Tejero, David Büchser, Carmen Martin de Vidales, Saturnino González, Pablo Rodríguez, Luis Alberto San Jose, Guillermo Celada, Maria Teresa Murillo

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in The British journal of radiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Impact of image-guided radiation therapy with intraprostatic seeds on long-term toxicity in prostate cancer patients undergoing risk-adapted intensification therapy.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Innovations in prostate cancer: introductory editorial.The British journal of radiology · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Almudena ZapateroRadiation Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario de la Princesa, Health Research Institute IIS-IP, Madrid, Spain.
Maria RochMedical Physics Department, Hospital Universitario de la Princesa, Health Research Institute IIS-IP, Madrid, Spain.
Pablo Castro TejeroMedical Physics Department, Hospital Universitario de la Princesa, Health Research Institute IIS-IP, Madrid, Spain.
David BüchserRadiation Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario de la Princesa, Health Research Institute IIS-IP, Madrid, Spain.
Carmen Martin de VidalesRadiation Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario de la Princesa, Health Research Institute IIS-IP, Madrid, Spain.
Saturnino GonzálezRadiology Department, Hospital Universitario de la Princesa, Health Research Institute IIS-IP, Madrid, Spain.
Pablo RodríguezRadiology Department, Hospital Universitario de la Princesa, Health Research Institute IIS-IP, Madrid, Spain.
Luis Alberto San JoseUrology Department, Hospital Universitario de la Princesa, Health Research Institute IIS-IP, Madrid, Spain.
Guillermo CeladaUrology Department, Hospital Universitario de la Princesa, Health Research Institute IIS-IP, Madrid, Spain.
Maria Teresa MurilloRadiation Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario de la Princesa, Health Research Institute IIS-IP, Madrid, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo determine morphological and biological control as well as toxicity and quality of life (QoL) of men with localized prostate cancer (PCa) treated with MRI-guided focal boost radiotherapy. MATERIAL AND

methods30 patients with PCa and a visible dominant intraprostatic lesion (DIL) identified on mpMRI were included in a prospective Phase II trial. Matching point registration of planning CT and T2W, diffusion-weighted and a gradient-recalled echo (GRE) MRI images made in treatment position was used for prostate and tumour delineation. Treatment consisted on 35 daily fractions of 2.17 Gy with a concomitant focal boost to the DIL of 2.43 Gy using volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT) with intraprostatic fiducial markers. Biochemical failure was analysed using PSA nadir +2 ng/mL criteria and local control using mpMRI evaluation at 6-9 months following RT. Acute and late toxicity were defined according to CTCAE v.4.0 and RTOG/EORTC scales and QoL was assessed using IPSS, EPIC short-form and UCLA-PCI questionnaires.

resultsThe median radiation dose to the prostate was 77.6 Gy (IQR 77.3-78.1), and to the DIL was 85.5 Gy (IQR 85.0-86.0). With a median follow up of 30.0 months (IQR 25.5-40.27), all patients remain free of biochemical relapse. An mpMRI complete response was observed in 25 patients during the first post-treatment evaluation at 6 months. The remaining five patients achieved a complete disappearance of the DIL both on T2 and DWI on the second mpMRI performed at 9 months following treatment. Six out of 30 (20%) patients presented acute Grade 2 urinary toxicity with no Grade 3 acute complications. Acute rectal toxicity was only found in 2 (6.6%) patients (both Grade 1). Only late Grade 1 urinary and rectal complications were observed in 3/30 patients, respectively, with no Grade 2 or more late toxicity. The urinary, bowel and sexual bother EPIC scores were slightly and insignificantly increased in the first 3 months post-treatment, returning to normal afterwards.

conclusionsmpMRI-guided focal boost using VMAT hypofractionated technique is associated with an excellent morphological and functional response control and a safe toxicity profile. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: In the present trial, we examined the potential role of mpMRI for radiological assessment (functional and morphological) of treatment response in high-risk prostate cancer patients treated with MRI-guided focal radiotherapy dose intensification to dominant Intraprostatic lesion.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingRadiotherapy, Intensity-ModulatedAgedBiomarkers, TumorHumansMaleNeoplasm GradingNeoplasm StagingProspective StudiesProstate-Specific AntigenProstatic NeoplasmsQuality of LifeRadiotherapy DosageRadiotherapy, Image-GuidedBiomarkers, TumorProstate-Specific Antigen

Identifiers

PMID34538073
PMCPMC8978233

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.