Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34537839›Full record

Observational studyFamily practice2022

A retrospective, observational study on medication for opioid use disorder during pregnancy and risk for neonatal abstinence syndrome.

Ayesha Sujan, Emma Cleary, Edie Douglas, Rubin Aujla, Lisa Boyars, Claire Smith, Constance Guille

Open access · greenAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Family practice, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Delivery timing for the opioid-exposed infant.American journal of obstetrics & gynecology MFM · 2022
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ayesha SujanDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-4374-9949
Emma ClearyDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University-Bloomington, Bloomington, IN, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-6929-544X
Edie DouglasDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States.
Rubin AujlaDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States.
Lisa BoyarsDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States.
Claire SmithDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States.
Constance GuilleDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-6004-3027
Medical University of South Carolina · USIndiana University Bloomington · USKaiser Permanente · US

Funding

TRAINING PROGRAM IN INTEGRATIVE DEVELOPMENTAL PROCESST32HD007475 · NICHD · TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY · PI LINDA B. SMITH · 1995 to 2026
$9.5M
Web-Based Treatment for Perinatal Opioid Use DisorderR34DA046730 · NIDA · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI GUILLE, CONSTANCE · 2019 to 2020
$899k
NICHD NIH HHS T32 HD007475NIDA NIH HHS R34 DA046730
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe prevalence of opioid use disorder (OUD) among pregnant women is increasing. Research consistently demonstrates the efficacy of medications for OUD (MOUD); however, researchers have called for additional studies evaluating the safety of MOUD during pregnancy, particularly the relative safety of two commonly used MOUD medications-methadone and buprenorphine. This study aimed to evaluate the consequences of MOUD exposure during pregnancy on risk for neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS).

methodsIn a clinical sample of infants born to women with OUD, we evaluated the risk of NAS among those exposed to (i) methadone and (ii) buprenorphine compared with those unexposed to MOUD, as well as the risk of NAS among those exposed to (i) methadone compared with those exposed to (ii) buprenorphine.

resultsCompared with buprenorphine-exposed infants (n = 37), methadone-exposed infants (n = 27) were at increased risk for NAS (odds ratio [OR] = 4.67, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.03, 21.17). Compared with unexposed infants (n = 43), buprenorphine-exposed infants were at decreased risk for NAS (OR = 0.45, 95% CI: 0.14, 1.39) and methadone-exposed infants were at increased risk for NAS (OR = 2.64, 95% CI: 0.79, 8.76), though these associations were not statistically significant.

conclusionsOur study suggests that when methadone and buprenorphine are equally appropriate options for the treatment of OUD in pregnant women, buprenorphine may add the additional benefit of reduced risk of newborn NAS.

Indexed as

BuprenorphineNeonatal Abstinence SyndromeOpioid-Related DisordersPregnancy ComplicationsAnalgesics, OpioidFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMethadoneOpiate Substitution TreatmentPregnancyRetrospective StudiesAnalgesics, OpioidBuprenorphineMethadoneaddiction medicineneonatologyobstetrics/postpartum caresubstance abuse (not tobacco)women’s health/gynecology

Identifiers

PMID34537839
PMCPMC8956128
OpenAlexW3200208153

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.