Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34537579›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in neurobiology2021

Interpreting neural computations by examining intrinsic and embedding dimensionality of neural activity.

Mehrdad Jazayeri, Srdjan Ostojic

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in neurobiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 105 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
105citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

105 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Artificial neural manifolds.Nature communications · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Live Spike Sorting of Large-scale Neural Recordings.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. A complex network perspective on brain disease.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2026
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Quantifying the compressibility of the human brain.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Spark: modular spiking neural networks.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026
    Article

45 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mehrdad JazayeriMcGovern Institute for Brain Research, Department of Brain & Cognitive Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, 02139, USA.
Srdjan OstojicLaboratoire de Neurosciences Cognitives, INSERM U960, École Normale Supérieure - PSL Research University, 75005, Paris, France. Electronic address: srdjan.ostojic@ens.fr.

Funding

CRCNS: US-French Research Proposal: Principles of Inference through Neural Dynamics R01MH122025 · NIMH · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI JAZAYERI, MEHRDAD · 2019 to 2023
$1.2M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH122025
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ongoing exponential rise in recording capacity calls for new approaches for analysing and interpreting neural data. Effective dimensionality has emerged as an important property of neural activity across populations of neurons, yet different studies rely on different definitions and interpretations of this quantity. Here, we focus on intrinsic and embedding dimensionality, and discuss how they might reveal computational principles from data. Reviewing recent works, we propose that the intrinsic dimensionality reflects information about the latent variables encoded in collective activity while embedding dimensionality reveals the manner in which this information is processed. We conclude by highlighting the role of network models as an ideal substrate for testing more specifically various hypotheses on the computational principles reflected through intrinsic and embedding dimensionality.

Indexed as

Neural Networks, Computer

Identifiers

PMID34537579
PMCPMC8688220

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.