Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34537575›Full record

ArticlePublic health2021

Psychological distress, low-income, and socio-economic vulnerability in the COVID-19 pandemic.

C L A Santana, C V Manfrinato, P R P Souza, A Marino, V F Condé, E Stedefeldt, L Y Tomita, M do Carmo Franco

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

C L A SantanaPaulista School of Nursing, Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
C V ManfrinatoPreventive Medicine Department, Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
P R P SouzaDivision of Translational Medicine, School of Medicine, Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
A MarinoFederal University of ABC, São Paulo, Brazil.
V F CondéPaulista School of Nursing, Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
E StedefeldtPreventive Medicine Department, Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
L Y TomitaPreventive Medicine Department, Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
M do Carmo FrancoDivision of Translational Medicine, School of Medicine, Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil; Institute of Advanced Studies, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil. Electronic address: maria.franco@unifesp.br.
Universidade Federal de São Paulo · BRUniversidade de São Paulo · BRUniversidade Federal do ABC · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesAlthough literature broadly reports the impact of COVID-19 on global mental health, little is known about the extent of its deleterious impact on the most vulnerable individuals. The present study aimed to evaluate the level of psychological distress of adult's residents of two urban shantytown communities located in São Paulo city, Brazil. STUDY

designThis was a cross-sectional study.

methodsAn online questionnaire was divided into four sections: (1) informed consent, (2) socio-economic data, (3) 12-item general health questionnaire, and (4) Brazilian food insecurity scale was applied.

resultsOf the 495 family headship (448 females and 47 males), the mean age was 36.1 years, 85% have an indication of psychological distress, 61.4% had a monthly income less than or equal to $70, and the incidence of households experiencing moderate or severe food insecurity was 40%. Multivariate logistic regression revealed that respondents who experienced moderate or severe food insecurity (odds ratio [OR] = 2.701, confidence interval [CI] 95% = 1.265-5.769; P = 0.010) and lower monthly income (OR = 2.031, CI 95% = 1.056-3.908; P = 0.034) had a higher risk of psychological distress. On the other hand, having an employment is a protective factor against the stressful situations caused by COVID-19 pandemic (P = 0.029).

conclusionThe present study identified low-income younger women residents of urban slums who suffer from food insecurity as high-risk groups to have psychological distress. Our findings are of particular importance because they showed the intersection of vulnerabilities during the COVID-19 outbreak.

Indexed as

COVID-19Psychological DistressAdultBrazilCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMalePandemicsPoverty AreasSARS-CoV-2Stress, PsychologicalCOVID-19Food insecurityPsychological distressSocio-economic vulnerabilityUrban slum

Identifiers

PMID34537575
PMCPMC8390360
OpenAlexW3196544564

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.