ArticlePlacenta2021
Quantitative T
Article in Placenta, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06290232 (Fetoscopic Laser Photocoagulation in Management of Vasa Previa - FLUMEN Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Fetoscopic Laser Photocoagulation in Management of Vasa Previa - FLUMEN Study
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Recent innovations in placental MRI: Integrating visualization and functional imaging.Placenta · 2026Review
- Characterizing T1 in the fetal brain and placenta over gestational age at 0.55T.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2024Article
- In vivo T2 measurements of the fetal brain using single-shot fast spin echo sequences.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2024Article
- The human placenta project: Funded studies, imaging technologies, and future directions.Placenta · 2023Review
- Comparing Magnetic Resonance Fingerprinting (MRF) and the MAGiC Sequence for Simultaneous T1 and T2 Quantitative Measurements in the Female Pelvis: A Prospective Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Magnetic resonance imaging of the monkey fetal brain in utero.Investigative magnetic resonance imaging · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
introductionMR relaxometry has been used to assess placental exchange function, but methods to date are not sufficiently fast to be robust to placental motion. Magnetic resonance fingerprinting (MRF) permits rapid, voxel-wise, intrinsically co-registered T
methodsThe accuracy of FISP-based, sliding-window reconstructed MRF was tested on phantoms. MRF scans in 9-s breath holds were acquired at 3T in 31 pregnant women during air and oxygen breathing. A mixed effects model was used to test for changes in placenta relaxation times between physiological states, to assess the dependency on gestational age (GA), and the impact of placental motion.
resultsMRF estimates of known phantom relaxation times resulted in mean absolute errors for T DISCUSSION: Well-characterized, motion-robust MRF was used to acquire T
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.