Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34537207›Full record

SynthesisThe Journal of allergy and clinical immunology2022

Recommendations for uniform definitions used in newborn screening for severe combined immunodeficiency.

Maartje Blom, Rolf H Zetterström, Asbjørg Stray-Pedersen, Kimberly Gilmour, Andrew R Gennery, Jennifer M Puck, Mirjam van der Burg

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Optimizing TREC- and KREC-based newborn screening: Risk-stratified algorithms significantly reduce referrals.Pediatric allergy and immunology : official publication of the European Society of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Impact of newborn screening for SCID on the management of congenital athymia.The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Congenital Athymia: Unmet Needs and Practical Guidance.Therapeutics and clinical risk management · 2023
    Review
  19. Article
  20. A Spot of Good News: Israeli Experience With SCID Newborn Screening.The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. In practice · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 6 institutions in 5 countries.

Maartje BlomDepartment of Pediatrics, Laboratory for Pediatric Immunology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Rolf H ZetterströmCentre for Inherited Metabolic Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Asbjørg Stray-PedersenNorwegian National Unit for Newborn Screening, Division of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Kimberly GilmourUniversity College London Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, United Kingdom; Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children National Health Service Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom; National Institute for Health Research-Great Ormond Street Hospital Biomedical Research Center, London, United Kingdom.
Andrew R GenneryChildren's Bone Marrow Transplant Unit, Great North Children's Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom; Translational and Clinical Research Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
Jennifer M PuckDivision of Allergy, Immunology, and Blood and Marrow Transplantation, Department of Pediatrics, University of California, San Francisco School of Medicine, San Francisco, Calif; University of California, San Francisco Benioff Children's Hospital San Francisco, San Francisco, Calif.
Mirjam van der BurgDepartment of Pediatrics, Laboratory for Pediatric Immunology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands. Electronic address: m.van_der_burg@lumc.nl.
Leiden University Medical Center · NLGreat North Children's Hospital · GBKarolinska University Hospital · SENational Health Service · GBOslo University Hospital · NOUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

Training of Clinical Investigators in Primary Immune DeficienciesU54AI082973 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI SULLIVAN, KATHLEEN E · 2009 to 2023
$23.3M
Inherited T cell defects: Diagnosis, Mechanisms and TreatmentsP01AI138962 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI BRENNER, STEVEN E · 2020 to 2024
$11.3M
Inherited Disorders of Lymphocyte DevelopmentR01AI078248 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI PUCK, JENNIFER M. · 2010 to 2014
$1.9M
NIAID NIH HHS P01 AI138962NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI078248NIAID NIH HHS U54 AI082973
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPublic health newborn screening (NBS) programs continuously evolve, taking advantage of international shared learning. NBS for severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID) has recently been introduced in many countries. However, comparison of screening outcomes has been hampered by use of disparate terminology and imprecise or variable case definitions for non-SCID conditions with T-cell lymphopenia.

objectivesThis study sought to determine whether standardized screening terminology could overcome a Babylonian confusion and whether improved case definitions would promote international exchange of knowledge.

methodsA systematic literature review highlighted the diverse terminology in SCID NBS programs internationally. While, as expected, individual screening strategies and tests were tailored to each program, we found uniform terminology to be lacking in definitions of disease targets, sensitivity, and specificity required for comparisons across programs.

resultsThe study's recommendations reflect current evidence from literature and existing guidelines coupled with opinion of experts in public health screening and immunology. Terminologies were aligned. The distinction between actionable and nonactionable T-cell lymphopenia among non-SCID cases was clarified, the former being infants with T-cell lymphopenia who could benefit from interventions such as protection from infections, antibiotic prophylaxis, and live-attenuated vaccine avoidance.

conclusionsBy bringing together the previously unconnected public health screening community and clinical immunology community, these SCID NBS deliberations bridged the gaps in language and perspective between these disciplines. This study proposes that international specialists in each disorder for which NBS is performed join forces to hone their definitions and recommend uniform registration of outcomes of NBS. Standardization of terminology will promote international exchange of knowledge and optimize each phase of NBS and follow-up care, advancing health outcomes for children worldwide.

Indexed as

LymphopeniaSevere Combined ImmunodeficiencyChildData CollectionHumansInfantInfant, NewbornNeonatal Screeningcase definitionsneonatal screeningNewborn screeningsevere combined immunodeficiency terminologyT-cell receptor excisions circles

Identifiers

PMID34537207
PMCPMC9278646
OpenAlexW3200984134

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.