Trial reportArthritis research & therapy2021
HLA-DRB1 risk alleles for RA are associated with differential clinical responsiveness to abatacept and adalimumab: data from a head-to-head, randomized, single-blind study in autoantibody-positive early RA.
Trial report in Arthritis research & therapy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02557100 (A Randomized, Head-to-Head, Single-Blinded Study to Assess Changes in the Immune Profile in Response to Treatment With Subcutaneous Abatacept in Combination With Methotrexate Versus Subcutaneous Adalimumab in Combination With Methotrexate in Adults With Early Rheumatoid Arthritis Who Are Naive to Biologic Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs), which is not on this map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Randomized, Head-to-Head, Single-Blinded Study to Assess Changes in the Immune Profile in Response to Treatment With Subcutaneous Abatacept in Combination With Methotrexate Versus Subcutaneous Adalimumab in Combination With Methotrexate in Adults With Early Rheumatoid Arthritis Who Are Naive to Biologic Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 50 citations in OpenAlex.
- Abatacept and the risk of malignancy: a meta-analysis across disease indications.Rheumatology (Oxford, England) · 2025Pooled it
- Baseline Interleukin-10 Levels as a Predictive Biomarker for Achieving Clinical Response With Abatacept in Patients Who Were Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drug Naive and Anti-Citrullinated Protein Antibody Positive With Early Rheumatoid Arthritis.Arthritis & rheumatology (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2026Trial
- Association of rheumatoid factor, anti-citrullinated protein antibodies and shared epitope with clinical response to initial treatment in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis: data from a randomised controlled trial.Annals of the rheumatic diseases · 2024Trial
- Influence of the shared epitope on the effectiveness of biologic antirheumatic agents in European patients with rheumatoid arthritis.RMD open · 2026Article
- [Role of HLA genetic variants in autoimmune diseases].Zhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences · 2026Review
- The Th17/Treg axis: a key to understanding and treating autoimmune disorders.Open life sciences · 2026Article
- Comparative Effectiveness of Abatacept Versus Adalimumab in Shared Epitope Positive and Negative Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis.Arthritis & rheumatology (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2026Article
- Comparative analysis of clinical profile, therapeutic management, and clinical prognosis of patients with seropositive or seronegative rheumatoid arthritis following the introduction of a first targeted therapy in a real-life setting.Clinical rheumatology · 2025Article
- Precision Medicine in Rheumatology: The Role of Biomarkers in Diagnosis and Treatment Optimization.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Evaluation of B cell related markers and autoantibodies in rheumatoid arthritis patients treated with abatacept.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
- Real-world clinical outcomes and rationale for initiating abatacept as a first-line biologic for patients with anticitrullinated protein antibody- and rheumatoid factor-positive rheumatoid arthritis.Journal of comparative effectiveness research · 2024Article
- Article
- Association of HLA-DRB1 locus with treatment response to abatacept or TNF inhibitors in patients with seropositive rheumatoid arthritis.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Comparative effectiveness of abatacept versus TNF inhibitors in rheumatoid arthritis patients who are ACPA and shared epitope positive.Advances in rheumatology (London, England) · 2024Article
- Abatacept increases T cell exhaustion in early RA individuals who carry HLA risk alleles.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Article
- The effective threshold dose of etanercept in patients with methotrexate-resistant rheumatoid arthritis.Clinical rheumatology · 2023Article
- Carriers of HLA-DRB1*04:05 have a better clinical response to abatacept in rheumatoid arthritis.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Benefits of Autoantibody Enrichment in Early Rheumatoid Arthritis: Analysis of Efficacy Outcomes in Four Pooled Abatacept Trials.Rheumatology and therapy · 2023Article
- Making inroads to precision medicine for the treatment of autoimmune diseases: Harnessing genomic studies to better diagnose and treat complex disorders.Cambridge prisms. Precision medicine · 2023Review
- Organokines in Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Critical Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCertain risk alleles associated with autoantibody-positive rheumatoid arthritis (RA) have been linked to poorer prognoses. In patients with autoantibody-positive RA, abatacept shows differential efficacy to tumor necrosis factor inhibitors. Our aim was to investigate the relationship between clinical response to abatacept and to adalimumab and presence of risk alleles encoding human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-DRB1 shared epitope (SE) in RA.
methodsIn this head-to-head study, biologic-naïve adults with early (≤ 12 months), moderate-to-severe RA and inadequate response to methotrexate (MTX-IR), autoantibody-positive for both anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide 2 and rheumatoid factor, were randomized 1:1 to receive subcutaneous abatacept 125 mg weekly or subcutaneous adalimumab 40 mg every 2 weeks for 24 weeks with stable, weekly oral MTX. An open-label period to 48 weeks followed, during which adalimumab-treated patients were switched to abatacept. Patients were genotyped for HLA-DRB1 alleles and classified as SE-positive (≥ 1 SE allele) or SE-negative (no SE alleles). Efficacy was assessed at weeks 24 and 48.
resultsForty patients each received abatacept (9 SE-negative, 30 SE-positive, one unknown) or adalimumab (9 SE-negative, 31 SE-positive). Mean age and disease duration were 46.0 years and 5.5 months, respectively. At week 24, a greater percentage of abatacept patients achieved 50% improvement in ACR criteria (ACR50) compared with adalimumab patients (73% vs 45%, respectively) and estimate of difference (95% confidence interval [CI]), 28 (5, 48). In SE-positive patients, ACR50 estimate of difference (95% CI) was 32 (7, 55). During the open-label period, responses were sustained in the abatacept non-switch group and showed trends toward further improvement in the adalimumab-to-abatacept switch group at week 48, in both the overall and the SE-positive subpopulation. No new safety signals were identified.
conclusionsIn MTX-IR patients with early, autoantibody-positive RA, abatacept resulted in numerically higher efficacy responses versus adalimumab after 24 weeks, with more pronounced treatment differences in SE-positive patients. After 48 weeks, responses were sustained in patients who continued abatacept while those who switched to abatacept showed further clinical improvement, overall, and in SE-positive patients. This supports co-stimulation blockade as an effective treatment strategy for patients with early, autoantibody-positive RA, particularly among SE-positive patients.
trial registrationNIH US National Library of Medicine, NCT02557100 . Registered on September 23, 2015.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.