Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34537041›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2021

Associations between occupational therapy students' academic performance and their study approaches and perceptions of the learning environment.

T Bonsaksen, T A Magne, L Stigen, A Gramstad, L Åsli, G Mørk, S G Johnson, T Carstensen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

T BonsaksenDepartment of Health and Nursing Sciences, Faculty of Social and Health Sciences, Inland Norway University of Applied Science, Elverum, Norway. tore.bonsaksen@inn.no.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6315-1111
T A MagneDepartment of Neuromedicine and Movement Science, Faculty of Medicine and Health Science, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
L StigenDepartment of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Science, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Gjøvik, Norway.
A GramstadUiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.
L ÅsliUiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.
G MørkFaculty of Health Studies, VID Specialized University, Sandnes, Norway.
S G JohnsonDepartment of Occupational Therapy, Faculty of health and function, Western Norway University of Applied Sciences, Bergen, Norway.
T CarstensenDepartment of Neuromedicine and Movement Science, Faculty of Medicine and Health Science, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRelationships between students' academic performance and their employed study approaches have been studied extensively. However, research using study approaches and learning environment factors as concurrent predictors of academic performance is sparse. There is a need to disentangle the potentially interrelated influences of individual and contextual factors on students' academic performance.

objectiveThis study aimed to increase the understanding of the associations between occupational therapy students' academic performance, and their approaches to studying, perceptions of the learning environment, and sociodemographic characteristics.

methodA cross-sectional study was designed, and 174 first-year students completed the Approaches and Study Skills Inventory for Students and the Course Experience Questionnaire, in addition to background information. Data on grades were collected from the data registries of each education institution, and associations were analyzed by multiple linear regression.

resultsNone of the learning environment scales were associated with grades. Adjusting for all variables, better exam results were associated with being female (β = 0.22, p < 0.01) and having higher scores on strategic approach (β = 0.31, p < 0.001) and lower scores on surface approach (β = -0.20, p < 0.01).

conclusionThe study suggests that students with a desire for obtaining good grades ought to use strategic study behaviors and avoid using surface approach behaviors. While it is important to ensure good quality of the learning environment for a variety of reasons, the learning environment did not contribute significantly to explain the students' academic performance.

Indexed as

Academic PerformanceOccupational TherapyStudents, MedicalCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansPerceptionStudentsSurveys and QuestionnairesAcademic performanceApproaches to studyingGrade point averageHigher educationLearning environmentOccupational therapy

Identifiers

PMID34537041
PMCPMC8449916

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.