Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34537000›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2021

"Preterm birth risk, me?" Women risk perception about premature delivery - a qualitative analysis.

Thaís V Silva, Silvana F Bento, Leila Katz, Rodolfo C Pacagnella

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Thaís V SilvaSchool of Medical Sciences, University of Campinas (UNICAMP), R. Alexander Fleming, 101. Cidade Universitária. Barão Geraldo, SP, Campinas, Brazil.
Silvana F BentoWomen's Hospital "Prof. Dr. José A Pinotti" - Center for Integral Attention to Women (CAISM), University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, SP, Brazil.
Leila KatzInstituto de Medicina Integral Prof. Fernando Figueira (IMIP), Recife, PE, Brazil.
Rodolfo C PacagnellaSchool of Medical Sciences, University of Campinas (UNICAMP), R. Alexander Fleming, 101. Cidade Universitária. Barão Geraldo, SP, Campinas, Brazil. rodolfopacagnella@gmail.com.
Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) · BRInstituto de Medicina Integral Professor Fernando Figueira · BRUniversidade de Pernambuco · BR

Funding

Gates Foundation INV-008001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRisk perception is based on collective indicators, but it is influenced by the individual's self-perception of his health-disease process. This study aims to investigate the risk perception of pregnant women who were identified as high-risk for premature birth and to seek strategies for better management of such cases.

methodsThis is a cross-sectional study where women who had completed their participation in P5 trial were contacted and invited to answer a structured questionnaire with open questions. Data were collected by telephone and analyzed using thematic analysis. The analysis categories were defined, and all the answers were reviewed, categorized, grouped, and a descriptive summary was prepared.

resultsTwo hundred eight Brazilian women have participated. Three categories were identified: (1) Risk perception mediated by health professionals; (2) Self-perception of risk through personal experiences and relationships; (3) Perception of treatment success. After receiving an explanation from a health professional about short cervix and premature birth, women understood the risk of premature delivery, recognizing the importance of early diagnosis to prevent premature birth. Unsuccessful previous experiences in prior pregnancies influenced women's risk perception. Patients believed in the success of the treatment performed, placing their hopes on the treatment even without research guarantees about benefits.

conclusionsPregnant women's risk perception regarding prematurity is based partly on personal and family experiences but mainly on information given by health professionals. The risk perception about preterm birth may contribute to healthy pregnancy, guiding necessary interventions and preventing adverse outcomes. Prevention studies on prematurity should thus focus on neonatal outcomes.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticePerceptionAdultBrazilCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornPregnancyPregnant PeoplePremature BirthProgesteroneProgestinsQualitative ResearchRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRiskProgesteroneProgestinsPregnancyPremature deliveryRisk perception

Identifiers

PMID34537000
PMCPMC8449432
OpenAlexW3199408390

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.