Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34536987›Full record

ArticleColorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland2021

Trends in risk factors of anastomotic leakage after colorectal cancer surgery (2011-2019): A Dutch population-based study.

Melissa N N Arron, Nynke G Greijdanus, Richard P G Ten Broek, Jan Willem T Dekker, Frans van Workum, Harry van Goor, Pieter J Tanis, Johannes H W de Wilt

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Anastomotic Leak Following Colorectal Surgery.Clinics in colon and rectal surgery · 2026
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Melissa N N ArronRadboud Institute for Health Sciences, Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Nynke G GreijdanusRadboud Institute for Health Sciences, Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Richard P G Ten BroekRadboud Institute for Health Sciences, Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Jan Willem T DekkerDepartment of Surgery, Reinier de Graaf Hospital, Delft, The Netherlands.
Frans van WorkumDepartment of Surgery, Canisius-Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Harry van GoorRadboud Institute for Health Sciences, Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Pieter J TanisAmsterdam UMC, Department of Surgery, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-3146-3310
Johannes H W de WiltRadboud Institute for Health Sciences, Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Radboud University Nijmegen · NLAmsterdam University Medical Centers · NLCanisius-Wilhelmina Ziekenhuis · NLReinier de Graaf Hospital · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimAnastomotic leakage (AL) after colon cancer (CC) and rectal cancer (RC) surgery often requires reintervention. Prevalence and morbidity may change over time with evolutions in treatment strategies and changes in patient characteristics. This nationwide study aimed to evaluate changes in the incidence, risk factors and mortality from AL during the past nine years.

methodsData of CC and RC resections with primary anastomosis were extracted from the Dutch Colorectal Audit (2011-2019). AL was registered if requiring reintervention. Three consecutive cohorts were compared using logistic regression analysis.

resultsIncidence of AL after CC surgery decreased from 6.6% in 2011-2013 to 4.8% in 2017-2019 and increased from 8.6% to 11.9% after RC surgery. In 2011-2013, male sex, ASA ≥3, (y)pT3-4, neoadjuvant therapy, emergency surgery and multivisceral resection were identified as risk factors for AL after CC surgery. In 2017-2019, only male sex and ASA ≥3 were risk factors for AL. For RC patients, male sex and neoadjuvant therapy were a risk factor for AL in 2011-2013. In 2017-2019, transanal approach was also a risk factor for AL. Postoperative mortality rate after AL was 12% (CC) and 2% (RC) in 2017-2019, without significant changes over time.

conclusionContradictory trends in incidence and mortality for AL were observed among CC and RC surgery with changing risk factors over the past 9 years. High mortality after AL is only observed after CC surgery and remains unchanged. Continued efforts should be made to improve early detection and treatment of AL for these patients.

Indexed as

Digestive System Surgical ProceduresRectal NeoplasmsAnastomosis, SurgicalAnastomotic LeakEarly Detection of CancerHumansMaleRetrospective StudiesRisk Factorsanastomotic leakagecolorectal cancerrisk factor

Identifiers

PMID34536987
PMCPMC9293104
OpenAlexW3198944271

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.