Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34536211›Full record

ArticleTissue engineering and regenerative medicine2022

Vascularization of Microvascular Fragment Isolates from Visceral and Subcutaneous Adipose Tissue of Mice.

Thomas Später, Julia E Marschall, Lea K Brücker, Ruth M Nickels, Wolfgang Metzger, Michael D Menger, Matthias W Laschke

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tissue engineering and regenerative medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. PMHeliyon · 2024
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Thomas SpäterInstitute for Clinical and Experimental Surgery, Saarland University, 66421, Homburg, Germany.
Julia E MarschallInstitute for Clinical and Experimental Surgery, Saarland University, 66421, Homburg, Germany.
Lea K BrückerInstitute for Clinical and Experimental Surgery, Saarland University, 66421, Homburg, Germany.
Ruth M NickelsInstitute for Clinical and Experimental Surgery, Saarland University, 66421, Homburg, Germany.
Wolfgang MetzgerDepartment of Trauma, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, Saarland University, 66421, Homburg, Germany.
Michael D MengerInstitute for Clinical and Experimental Surgery, Saarland University, 66421, Homburg, Germany.
Matthias W LaschkeInstitute for Clinical and Experimental Surgery, Saarland University, 66421, Homburg, Germany. matthias.laschke@uks.eu.ORCID 0000-0002-7847-8456
Saarland University · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAdipose tissue-derived microvascular fragments (MVF) represent effective vascularization units for tissue engineering. Most experimental studies in rodents exclusively use epididymal adipose tissue as a visceral fat source for MVF isolation. However, in future clinical practice, MVF may be rather isolated from liposuctioned subcutaneous fat tissue of patients. Therefore, we herein compared the vascularization characteristics of MVF isolates from visceral and subcutaneous fat tissue of murine origin.

methodsMVF isolates were generated from visceral and subcutaneous fat tissue of donor mice using two different enzymatic procedures. For in vivo analyses, the MVF isolates were seeded onto collagen-glycosaminoglycan scaffolds and implanted into full-thickness skin defects within dorsal skinfold chambers of recipient mice.

resultsBy means of the two isolation procedures, we isolated a higher number of MVF from visceral fat tissue when compared to subcutaneous fat tissue, while their length distribution, viability and cellular composition were comparable in both groups. Intravital fluorescence microscopy as well as histological and immunohistochemical analyses revealed a significantly reduced vascularization of implanted scaffolds seeded with subcutaneous MVF isolates when compared to implants seeded with visceral MVF isolates. Light and scanning electron microscopy showed that this was due to high amounts of undigested connective tissue within the subcutaneous MVF isolates, which clogged the scaffold pores and prevented the interconnection of individual MVF into new microvascular networks.

conclusionThese findings indicate the need for improved protocols to generate connective tissue-free MVF isolates from subcutaneous fat tissue for future translational studies.

Indexed as

MicrovesselsNeovascularization, PhysiologicAnimalsHumansMiceMice, Inbred C57BLSubcutaneous FatTissue EngineeringAngiogenesisMicrovascular fragmentsScaffoldTissue engineeringVascularization

Identifiers

PMID34536211
PMCPMC8782984
OpenAlexW3201130017

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.