ArticleThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2022
Validity of resting strain/strain rate in prediction of myocardial viability.
Article in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Speckle-tracking echocardiography for predicting improvement of myocardial contractile function after revascularization: a meta-analysis of prospective trials.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2023Pooled it
- Can multiparametric FDG-PET/MRI analysis really enhance the prediction of myocardial recovery after CTO revascularization? A machine learning study.Zeitschrift fur medizinische Physik · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To evaluate the validity of the resting strain/strain rate measurements in predicting myocardial viability taking delayed enhancement cardiac magnetic resonance imaging as the gold standard. A cohort of 60 patients at three months followed up after acute myocardial infarction were recruited for this study. Resting echocardiography with offline analysis of deformation indices and gadolinium contrast enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance imaging were applied for all patients. For the final assessment, 268 segments with significant resting wall motion abnormalities were presented. Resting longitudinal strain was significantly (p < 0.05) higher in viable, compared with non-viable segments in all the studied individual myocardial segments (apical inferior, mid antro-lateral, mid-inferolateral, mid inferoseptum, and all other segments). Likewise, resting longitudinal strain rate was significantly (p < 0.05) higher in viable, compared with non-viable segments in almost all studied individual myocardial segments apart from apical inferior, mid inferolateral and basal antro-septum (p = 0.245, p = 0.098, p = 0.097 respectively). Resting Strain and Resting Strain rate could be used as accurate predictors of myocardia viability following acute myocardial infarction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34536175What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.