Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34536163›Full record

ReviewJournal of medical ultrasonics (2001)2021

Quantitative assessment of liver steatosis using ultrasound: dual-energy CT.

Akira Yamada, Eriko Yoshizawa

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of medical ultrasonics (2001), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Akira YamadaDepartment of Radiology, Shinshu University School of Medicine, 3-1-1 Asahi, Matsumoto, Nagano, 390-2621, Japan. a_yamada@shinshu-u.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4199-203X
Eriko YoshizawaDepartment of Radiology, Shinshu University School of Medicine, 3-1-1 Asahi, Matsumoto, Nagano, 390-2621, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reflecting the growing interest in early diagnosis of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in recent years, the development of noninvasive and reliable fat quantification methods is needed. Dual-energy computed tomography (DE-CT) is a quantitative diagnostic imaging method that estimates the composition of the imaging target using a material decomposition technique based on the X-ray absorption characteristics peculiar to substances from DE-CT scanning using X-rays generated with different energies (tube voltage). In this review article, we first explain the basic principles and technical aspects of DE-CT. Then, we will present the current diagnostic ability of DE-CT and the factors influencing the quantitative evaluation of liver steatosis using DE-CT as compared to multi-modal methods including ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging-based methods. In brief, DE-CT may have comparable diagnostic performance to the modern US-based liver fat measurement methods. However, the current material decomposition technique using DE-CT does not seem to have added value to the simple quantitative assessment of liver steatosis, because DE-CT measurement does not improve the accuracy of fat quantification over conventional single-energy computed tomography (SE-CT) attenuation. The most significant influencing factor for the quantitative assessment of liver steatosis using DE-CT can be hepatic iron deposition. An iron-specific multi-material decomposition algorithm correcting for the influences of iron in the liver has been under development. The current material decomposition algorithm can still have added value in a specific situation such as the quantitative assessment of liver steatosis using contrast-enhanced DE-CT. However, there is a lack of evidence for the influence of liver fibrosis in the quantitative assessment of liver steatosis using DE-CT.

Indexed as

Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver DiseaseTomography, X-Ray ComputedHumansLiverMagnetic Resonance ImagingUltrasonographyDual-energy computed tomographyIodineIronMaterial decompositionSteatosis

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.