ArticleJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology2022
A comprehensive prognostic analysis of osimertinib treatment in advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients with acquired EGFR-T790M mutation: a real-world study.
Article in Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeOsimertinib is the standard treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with T790M mutation after the failure of first-/second-generation epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKI). We comprehensively analyzed factors that affect the therapeutic efficacy of the osimertinib treatment in NSCLC patients.
methods351 NSCLC patients with T790M mutation receiving osimertinib treatment were included. We investigated the value of different factors in predicting the clinical outcomes of the osimertinib therapy, including progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and objective response rate (ORR). Logistic and COX regression were used to identify prognosticators.
resultsIn osimertinib therapy, EGFR mutation status (19Del/L858R) at initial diagnosis and the therapeutic choice of prior EGFR-TKI agent was not associated with patients' prognosis. Notably, the PFS of the prior EGFR-TKI was independently related to ORR (OR, 95% CI 0.98, 0.96-1.00, p = 0.030), PFS (HR, 95% CI 0.98, 0.97-1.00, p = 0.009) and OS (HR, 95% CI 0.96, 0.93-0.98, p < 0.001) of osimertinib treatment. Among distinct organ metastases, only bone metastasis was related to the efficacy of osimertinib, in terms of ORR (OR, 95% CI 1.97, 1.27-3.06, p = 0.002), PFS (HR, 95% CI 1.55, 1.18-2.03, p = 0.001) and OS (HR, 95% CI 1.81, 1.27-2.59, p = 0.001). However, the therapeutic efficacy of osimertinib was not further impacted by the accumulation of metastatic organs. A performance status score of 2-4 was also an adverse prognosticator for the osimertinib therapy.
conclusionPFS of the prior EGFR-TKI treatment, performance status score and bone metastasis were independent prognosticators of the osimertinib treatment. These findings may facilitate clinicians in the decision-making of osimertinib.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.