Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34536065›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials2022

New polyoxazoline loaded patches for hemostasis in experimental liver resection.

Edwin A Roozen, Michiel C Warlé, Roger M L M Lomme, Rosa P Félix Lanao, Harry van Goor

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05385952 nacompletednot on this map

A Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized Clinical Investigation Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of GATT-Patch Versus TachoSil for Hemostasis During Open Liver Surgery

TypeinterventionalSponsorGATT Technologies BVRan2022 to 2024Enrolled132ConditionsIntraoperative Bleeding, Hemorrhage, Surgical, Liver DiseasesArmsGATT-Patch (currently named ETHIZIA), TachoSil
NCT05900037 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

A Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized Clinical Investigation Evaluating GATT-Patch for Hemostasis During Minimally Invasive Liver and Gallbladder Surgery

TypeinterventionalSponsorGATT Technologies BVRan2023 to 2025Enrolled53ConditionsIntraoperative Bleeding, Liver Diseases, Gallbladder Diseases, Hemorrhage, SurgicalArmsGATT-Patch, SURGICEL® Original
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. New polyoxazoline loaded patches for hemostasis in experimental liver resection.Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Edwin A RoozenDepartment of Surgery, RadboudUMC, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Michiel C WarléDepartment of Surgery, RadboudUMC, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Roger M L M LommeDepartment of Surgery, RadboudUMC, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Rosa P Félix LanaoDepartment of Surgery, RadboudUMC, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Harry van GoorDepartment of Surgery, RadboudUMC, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Radboud University Nijmegen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A new cost-effective NHS functionalized polyoxazoline (POx) loaded polymer with strong hemostatic properties has been developed. In this study, we investigate POx loaded hemostatic patches regarding hemostatic efficacy, local inflammatory reaction and wound-healing, as compared to the non-POx treated blanks and commercially available hemostatic products. Hundred and ten rats divided into 11 groups of 10 animals underwent partial liver lobe resection. Eight groups received experimental patches, two groups commercially available hemostatic patches (TachoSil® and Veriset™, positive controls), one group with gauzes (negative control). Each animal received twice a patch with a size 1.5 × 2.5 cm, on each partially resected lobe. Primary endpoint was time to hemostasis (TTH). The rats were sacrificed at different time points (1, 3, or 7 days) to measure local inflammatory response and early wound healing. Of the POx loaded patches, GFC NHS-POx (TTH 20.4 s, p = .019) and GFC-NHS-POx1.5 (TTH 0.0 s, p = .003) showed significantly faster TTH compared to TachoSil® (TTH 95.4 s), and were comparable to Veriset™ (TTH 17.0 s). Three patches, GFC-NHS-POx 1.5 (TTH 0.0 s, p = .016), ORC NHS-POx:NU-POx (TTH 91.4 s, p = .033), and ORC-PLGA NHS-POx:NU-POx (TTH 105.6 s, p = .04) had a lower TTH compared to their own blank carrier (TTH 74.9, 157.8, and 195.7 s, respectively). With regard to biocompatibility, all POx loaded patches showed results comparable to TachoSil® and Veriset™. NHS-POx-loaded hemostatic patch demonstrate fast and effective hemostasis, comparable or better than commercially available hemostatic patches, with similar early biocompatibility.

Indexed as

HemostaticsAnimalsHemostasisHemostasis, SurgicalLiverRatsWound HealingHemostaticsbiocompatibilityhemostatic patchhistologyliver surgerypolyoxazoline derivate

Identifiers

PMID34536065
PMCPMC9290804
OpenAlexW3201102068

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.