Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34535862›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2022

Spatial optimization of the water quality monitoring network in São Paulo State (Brazil) to improve sampling efficiency and reduce bias in a developing sub-tropical region.

Ricardo Gabriel Bandeira de Almeida, Marta Condé Lamparelli, Walter Kennedy Dodds, Davi Gasparini Fernandes Cunha

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ricardo Gabriel Bandeira de AlmeidaDepartamento de Hidráulica e Saneamento, Escola de Engenharia de São Carlos, Universidade de São Paulo, Avenida Trabalhador São-Carlense, 400. Centro, São Carlos, SP, CEP 13566-590, Brazil. rgbalmeida@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3101-6016
Marta Condé LamparelliCompanhia Ambiental do Estado de São Paulo, Avenida Professor Frederico Hermann Júnior, 345. Alto de Pinheiros, São Paulo, SP, CEP 05459-900, Brazil.
Walter Kennedy DoddsDivision of Biology, Kansas State University, 116 Ackert Hall, Manhattan, KS, USA.
Davi Gasparini Fernandes CunhaDepartamento de Hidráulica e Saneamento, Escola de Engenharia de São Carlos, Universidade de São Paulo, Avenida Trabalhador São-Carlense, 400. Centro, São Carlos, SP, CEP 13566-590, Brazil.

Funding

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico #310844/2020-7
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Water quality monitoring networks (WQMNs) are essential to provide good data for management decisions. Nevertheless, some WQMNs may not appropriately reflect the conditions of the water bodies and their temporal/spatial dimensions, more particularly in developing countries. Also, some WQMNs may use more resources to attain management goals than necessary and can be improved. Here we analyzed the São Paulo State (Brazil) WQMN design in order to evaluate and increase its spatial representativeness based on cluster analysis and stratified sampling strategy focused on clear monitoring goals. We selected water resources management units (UGRHIs) representative of contrasting land uses in the state, with bimonthly data from 2004 to 2018 in 160 river/stream sites. Cluster analysis indicated monitoring site redundancy above 20% in most of the UGRHIs. We identified heterogeneous spatial strata based on land use, hydrological, and geological features through a stratified sampling strategy. We identified that monitoring sites overrepresented more impacted areas. Thus, the network is biased against determination of baseline conditions and towards highly modified aquatic systems. Our proposed spatial strategy suggested the reduction of the number of sites up to 12% in the UGRHIs with the highest population densities, while others would need expansions based on their environmental heterogeneity. The final densities ranged from 1.6 to 13.4 sites/1,000km

Indexed as

Water Pollutants, ChemicalWater QualityBrazilEnvironmental MonitoringPopulation DensityRiversWater Pollutants, ChemicalDeveloping countriesMonitoring efficiencyRivers and streamsSpatial optimizationWater pollutionWater quality surveillance

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.