Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34535797›Full record

ArticleCerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)2022

Functional Specialization of the Medial Temporal Lobes in Human Recognition Memory: Dissociating Effects of Hippocampal versus Parahippocampal Damage.

Georgios P D Argyropoulos, Carola Dell'Acqua, Emily Butler, Clare Loane, Adriana Roca-Fernandez, Azhaar Almozel, Nikolas Drummond, Carmen Lage-Martinez, Elisa Cooper, Richard N Henson and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Diencephalic integrity explains aspects of hippocampal amnesia.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Georgios P D ArgyropoulosMemory Research Group, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8267-6861
Carola Dell'AcquaMemory Research Group, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8394-4554
Emily ButlerMemory Research Group, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK.
Clare LoaneMemory Research Group, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9279-1185
Adriana Roca-FernandezMemory Research Group, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK.
Azhaar AlmozelMemory Research Group, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK.
Nikolas DrummondMemory Research Group, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3630-057X
Carmen Lage-MartinezMemory Research Group, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK.
Elisa CooperMRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit and Department of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 7EF, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3259-4408
Richard N HensonMRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit and Department of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 7EF, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0712-2639
Christopher R ButlerMemory Research Group, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7502-9284

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_UU_00005/8Medical Research Council MC_UU_00030/8Medical Research Council MR/K010395/1Medical Research Council SUAG/046 G101400
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A central debate in the systems neuroscience of memory concerns whether different medial temporal lobe (MTL) structures support different processes in recognition memory. Using two recognition memory paradigms, we tested a rare patient (MH) with a perirhinal lesion that appeared to spare the hippocampus. Consistent with a similar previous case, MH showed impaired familiarity and preserved recollection. When compared with patients with hippocampal lesions appearing to spare perirhinal cortex, MH showed greater impairment on familiarity and less on recollection. Nevertheless, the hippocampal patients also showed impaired familiarity compared with healthy controls. However, when replacing this traditional categorization of patients with analyses relating memory performance to continuous measures of damage across patients, hippocampal volume uniquely predicted recollection, whereas parahippocampal, rather than perirhinal, volume uniquely predicted familiarity. We consider whether the familiarity impairment in MH and our patients with hippocampal lesions arises from "subthreshold" damage to parahippocampal cortex (PHC). Our data provide the most compelling neuropsychological support yet for dual-process models of recognition memory, whereby recollection and familiarity depend on different MTL structures, and may support a role for PHC in familiarity. Our study highlights the value of supplementing single-case studies with examinations of continuous brain-behavior relationships across larger patient groups.

Indexed as

HippocampusPerirhinal CortexHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMental RecallNeuropsychological TestsRecognition, PsychologyTemporal LobeamnesiafamiliaritymemoryMRIrecollection

Identifiers

PMID34535797
PMCPMC9016283

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.