Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34535744›Full record

ArticleCommunications biology2021

Visual exploration dynamics are low-dimensional and driven by intrinsic factors.

Andrea Zangrossi, Giorgia Cona, Miriam Celli, Marco Zorzi, Maurizio Corbetta

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Spontaneous eye movements reflect the representational geometries of conceptual spaces.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Andrea ZangrossiDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7832-1953
Giorgia ConaPadova Neuroscience Center (PNC), University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
Miriam CelliPadova Neuroscience Center (PNC), University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
Marco ZorziDepartment of General Psychology, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
Maurizio CorbettaDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Padova, Padova, Italy. maurizio.corbetta@unipd.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8295-3304

Funding

Fundação Bial (Bial Foundation) 361/18
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

When looking at visual images, the eyes move to the most salient and behaviourally relevant objects. Saliency and semantic information significantly explain where people look. Less is known about the spatiotemporal properties of eye movements (i.e., how people look). We show that three latent variables explain 60% of eye movement dynamics of more than a hundred observers looking at hundreds of different natural images. The first component explaining 30% of variability loads on fixation duration, and it does not relate to image saliency or semantics; it approximates a power-law distribution of gaze steps, an intrinsic dynamic measure, and identifies observers with two viewing styles: static and dynamic. Notably, these viewing styles were also identified when observers look at a blank screen. These results support the importance of endogenous processes such as intrinsic dynamics to explain eye movement spatiotemporal properties.

Indexed as

Eye MovementsSemanticsVisual PerceptionAdultAttentionFemaleHumansItalyMaleStudentsYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID34535744
PMCPMC8448835

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.