ArticleScientific reports2021
The effect of chemical and structural modifiers on the haemostatic process and cytotoxicity of the beta-chitin patch.
Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Insects as Source of Nutraceuticals with Antioxidant, Antihypertensive, and Antidiabetic Properties: Focus on the Species Approved in Europe up to 2024.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Combination of 3D printing and electrospinning to develop chitin/gelatin/PVA scaffolds.International journal of bioprinting · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Beta-chitin patch has previously been proven to be an effective haemostat, but whether modifying the patch affects its efficacy and safety, remains unanswered. In this study, the patch was modified using polyethylene oxide, Pluronic-F127, calcium, increased thickness or polyphosphate, and their effect on the process of haemostasis and cytotoxicity was tested and compared with standard-of-care, Surgicel and FloSeal. Whole blood collected from volunteers was applied to the patches to test their whole blood clotting and thrombin generation capacities, whilst platelet isolates were used to test their platelet aggregation ability. The fluid absorption capacity of the patches was tested using simulated body fluid. Cytotoxicity of the patches was tested using AlamarBlue assays and PC12 cells and the results were compared with the standard-of-care. In this study, beta-chitin patch modifications failed to improve its whole blood clotting, platelet aggregation and thrombin generation capacity. Compared to non-modified patch, modifications with polyethylene oxide or calcium reduced platelet aggregation and thrombin generation capacity, while increasing the thickness or adding polyphosphate decreased platelet aggregation capacity. The cytotoxicity assays demonstrated that the beta-chitin patches were non-toxic to cells. In vivo research is required to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the beta-chitin patches in a clinical setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.